Literature DB >> 11401312

Pathological serosa and node-based classification accurately predicts gastric cancer recurrence risk and outcome, and determines potential and limitation of a Japanese-style extensive surgery for Western patients: a prospective with quality control 10-year follow-up study.

D H Roukos1, M Lorenz, K Karakostas, P Paraschou, C Batsis, A M Kappas .   

Abstract

UICC classification accurately predicts overall survival but not recurrence-risk. We report here data of overall and first site-specific recurrence following curative surgery useful for the development of recurrence-oriented preventive target therapies. Patients who underwent resection for gastric cancer were stratified according to curability of surgery [curative (R0) vs non-curative resection], extent of surgery [limited (D1) vs extended (D2) node dissection] and pathological nodal/serosal status. The intent-to-treat principle, log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were used for statistical analysis of time-to-event (recurrence, death) endpoints. Curative resection only produced a chance of cure whereas survival was very poor following non-curative resection (P < 0.0001). For D2 R0 subgroup of patients, a pathological serosa and a node state-based classification into three groups, proved to be of clinical implication. Risk of recurrence after a median follow-up of 92 months was low among patients with both serosa and node-negative cancer (first group; 11%), moderate among those with either serosa or node-positive cancer (second group; 53%) and very high among those with both serosa and node-positive cancer (third group; 83%). In multivariate analysis, the relative risks of recurrence and death from gastric cancer among patients in the second and third groups, as compared to those in the first, were 7.07 (95% CI, 2.36-21.17; P = 0.0002) and 16.19 (95% CI, 5.76-45.54; P < 0.0001) respectively. First site-specific recurrence analysis revealed: low rate of loco-regional recurrence alone (12%), serosa state determinant factor of the site-recurrence (peritoneal for serosa-positive and haematogenous for serosa-negative cancers) and dramatic increase of all types of recurrence by the presence of nodal metastases. Our findings demonstrate that a pathological serosa- and node-based classification is very simple and predicts accurately site-specific recurrence-risks. Furthermore they reveal that risk of recurrence following curative D2 surgery alone is low for serosa- and node-negative cancers, but very high in serosa- and node-positive cancers suggesting the need for new therapeutic strategies in this subgroup of patients. Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11401312      PMCID: PMC2363675          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  19 in total

1.  Postoperative outcome and sites of recurrence in patients following curative resection of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y Maehara; S Hasuda; T Koga; E Tokunaga; Y Kakeji; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Extended (D2) lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: do patients benefit?

Authors:  D H Roukos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Evidence of survival benefit of extended (D2) lymphadenectomy in western patients with gastric cancer based on a new concept: a prospective long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  D H Roukos; M Lorenz; A Encke
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow and survival of patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer.

Authors:  S Braun; K Pantel; P Müller; W Janni; F Hepp; C R Kentenich; S Gastroph; A Wischnik; T Dimpfl; G Kindermann; G Riethmüller; G Schlimok
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality.

Authors:  K Maruyama; K Okabayashi; T Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  RT-PCR-based detection of occult disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients with solid tumors. An overview.

Authors:  A Zippelius; K Pantel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Distal gastric cancer and extensive surgery: a new evaluation method based on the study of the status of residual lymph nodes after limited surgery.

Authors:  D H Roukos; P Paraschou; M Lorenz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons.

Authors:  H J Wanebo; B J Kennedy; J Chmiel; G Steele; D Winchester; R Osteen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Weeden; J Fielding; J Bancewicz; J Craven; V Joypaul; M Sydes; P Fayers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  30 in total

1.  To the editor: the role of prophylactic surgery in cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Fatouros; Georgios Baltogiannis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: may it improve also survival?

Authors:  Dimosthenis Ziogas; Dimitrios Roukos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy for organ-confined cancer: a reality in the West?

Authors:  Ernst Hanisch; Dimosthenis Ziogas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Expectations and challenges of laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Theodore Liakakos; Pavlos Patapis; Evangelos Misiakos; Anastasios Macheras
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Facts and trends in laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer.

Authors:  D Kanellos; M G Pramateftakis; Ioannis Kanellos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Beyond quality-of-life improvement: how robotic surgery for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision also may improve oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  E Hanisch; D Ziogas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Outweighing the benefits and weakness of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in the west.

Authors:  J Spiliotis; D Ziogas; G Baltogiannis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Open versus laparoscopic versus robotic gastrectomy for cancer: need for comparative-effectiveness quality.

Authors:  G Glantzounis; D Ziogas; G Baltogiannis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Surgeon's volume and number of lymph nodes in assessing colorectal cancer surgery and multimodal treatment quality.

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology.

Authors:  M Anzidei; A Napoli; F Zaccagna; P Di Paolo; C Zini; B Cavallo Marincola; D Geiger; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.