Literature DB >> 11401129

Value of programmed ventricular stimulation for prophylactic internal cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in postinfarction patients preselected by noninvasive risk stratifiers.

C Schmitt1, P Barthel, G Ndrepepa, J Schreieck, A Plewan, A Schömig, G Schmidt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the role of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) after noninvasive risk stratification to identify a subgroup of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) survivors considered at risk for ventricular arrhythmias and whether these patients could benefit from internal cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
BACKGROUND: The predictive value of noninvasive and invasive risk stratifiers after AMI has been questioned. The question of whether the group of patients with inducible monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) after AMI could profit from ICD implantation is unanswered.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 1,436 AMI survivors was screened noninvasively by Holter monitoring, heart rate variability, ventricular late potentials, and ejection fraction. A subgroup of 248 patients (17.3%) were identified as high-risk patients and scheduled for PVS. Due to the study design, 54 patients >75 years were excluded; thus, 194 patients were eligible for PVS. Triple extrastimuli at two paced cycle lengths (600 ms and 400 ms) were applied.
RESULTS: In a subgroup of 98 (51%) high-risk patients, PVS was performed; 21 patients had an abnormal response, and in 20 patients an ICD was implanted. During a mean follow-up of 607 days the arrhythmic event rate (sudden cardiac death, symptomatic VT, cardiac arrest) was 33% with a positive electrophysiological test versus 2.6% (p < 0.0001) with a negative electrophysiological test. A subgroup of 96 high-risk patients declined electrophysiological study. In this nonconsent group, cardiac mortality (combined sudden and nonsudden) was significantly higher (log-rank chi-square 9.38, p = 0.0022, relative risk 4.7, 1.6 to 13.9) compared to the group guided by electrophysiological testing and consecutive ICD implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: After a two-step risk stratification, PVS is helpful in selecting a subgroup of AMI survivors without spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias who benefit from prophylactic ICD implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11401129     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01246-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  14 in total

1.  Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death using implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Janet M McComb; A John Camm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-09

Review 2.  Arrhythmic risk stratification in heart failure: Time for the next step?

Authors:  Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Antonios Sideris; Emmanuel Kanoupakis; Skevos Sideris; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou; Theofilos M Kolettis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Utility of electrophysiological studies to predict arrhythmic events.

Authors:  Gabriela Hilfiker; Andreas W Schoenenberger; Paul Erne; Richard Kobza
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-26

4.  HRS policy statement: clinical cardiac electrophysiology fellowship curriculum: update 2011.

Authors:  Mark S Link; Derek V Exner; Mark Anderson; Michael Ackerman; Amin Al-Ahmad; Bradley P Knight; Steven M Markowitz; Elizabeth S Kaufman; David Haines; Samuel J Asirvatham; David J Callans; J Paul Mounsey; Frank Bogun; Sanjiv M Narayan; Andrew D Krahn; Suneet Mittal; Jagmeet Singh; John D Fisher; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  [Limits and scopes of invasive risk stratification. Do we still need programmed ventricular stimulation?].

Authors:  Sascha Rolf; Wilhelm Haverkamp
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Heart rate variability analysis in general medicine.

Authors:  Yi Gang; Marek Malik
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2003-01-01

7.  Ventricular tachycardia-inducibility predicts arrhythmic events in post-myocardial infarction patients with low ejection fraction. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcello Disertori; Michela Masè; Marta Rigoni; Giandomenico Nollo; Flavia Ravelli
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2018-06-14

Review 8.  Signal-averaged electrocardiography: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Petros Arsenos; Konstantinos Trachanas; Polychronis Dilaveris; Christos Antoniou; Dimitris Tsiachris; Skevos Sideris; Theofilos M Kolettis; Dimitrios Tousoulis
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-05-28

9.  Improved Stratification of Autonomic Regulation for risk prediction in post-infarction patients with preserved left ventricular function (ISAR-Risk).

Authors:  Axel Bauer; Petra Barthel; Raphael Schneider; Kurt Ulm; Alexander Müller; Anke Joeinig; Raphael Stich; Antti Kiviniemi; Katerina Hnatkova; Heikki Huikuri; Albert Schömig; Marek Malik; Georg Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  The prediction of ICD therapy in multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial (MADIT) II like patients: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Marco Budeus; Nico Reinsch; Heinrich Wieneke; Stefan Sack; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2008-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.