Literature DB >> 11401005

Threshold doses for nicotine discrimination in smokers and non-smokers.

K A Perkins1, C Fonte, M Sanders, J Meeker, A Wilson.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Tobacco use during initial experimentation often involves modest nicotine exposure, escalating to larger doses and more frequent exposure with the onset of tobacco dependence. Threshold doses for nicotine discrimination therefore may differ between naive and experienced tobacco users.
OBJECTIVES: We determined the lowest (threshold) dose of nasal spray nicotine that smokers and non-smokers could reliably discriminate from placebo spray.
METHODS: Male and female smokers (n=18) and non-smokers (n=17) were initially trained to discriminate 20 microg/kg from placebo before proceeding to threshold determination sessions, which involved discrimination of progressively lower doses below 20 microg/kg ("descending order" subgroup) or higher doses above 1 microg/kg ("ascending order" subgroup). Threshold was determined by the lowest dose reliably discriminated from placebo (correct on > or =80% of testing trials) and by failure to discriminate the next lowest dose.
RESULTS: Threshold doses for nicotine discrimination were low and not different between smokers and non-smokers (median thresholds of 3 versus 2 microg/kg and approximate blood levels of 2.6 versus 1.6 ng/ml, respectively). Thresholds were similar between descending and ascending order subgroups. Several subjective responses differentiated threshold dose from the dose just below threshold, particularly in non-smokers.
CONCLUSIONS: Threshold doses for nasal spray nicotine discrimination in humans are low, well below the typical nicotine delivery of most cigarette brands, and may not change after long-term smoking exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11401005     DOI: 10.1007/s002130000660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  17 in total

Review 1.  Nicotine reduction revisited: science and future directions.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Kenneth A Perkins; Mark G Lesage; David L Ashley; Jack E Henningfield; Neal L Benowitz; Cathy L Backinger; Mitch Zeller
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  How Intravenous Nicotine Administration in Smokers Can Inform Tobacco Regulatory Science.

Authors:  Kevin P Jensen; Elise E DeVito; Mehmet Sofuoglu
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 3.  Measures for assessing subjective effects of potential reduced-exposure products.

Authors:  Karen Hanson; Richard O'Connor; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Preliminary test of cigarette nicotine discrimination threshold in non-dependent versus dependent smokers.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Nicole Kunkle; Joshua L Karelitz; K A Perkins; N Kunkle; J L Karelitz
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 5.  The reinforcement threshold for nicotine as a target for tobacco control.

Authors:  Mehmet Sofuoglu; Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Subjective effects of transdermal nicotine among nonsmokers.

Authors:  Rebecca L Ashare; Joseph S Baschnagel; Larry W Hawk
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Threshold dose for behavioral discrimination of cigarette nicotine content in menthol vs. non-menthol smokers.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Nicole Kunkle; Joshua L Karelitz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Reinforcement Enhancing Effects of Nicotine Via Patch and Nasal Spray.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Joshua L Karelitz; Margaret C Boldry
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 9.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Hormones, nicotine, and cocaine: clinical studies.

Authors:  Nancy K Mello
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.587

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.