Literature DB >> 11399705

Differential transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis between linear artifacts and intraluminal flap of aortic dissection or disruption.

P Vignon1, K T Spencer, G Rambaud, P M Preux, D Krauss, B Balasia, R M Lang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relatively low specificity of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the diagnosis of aortic dissection (AD) or traumatic disruption of the aorta (TDA) has been attributed to linear artifacts. We sought to determine the incidence of intra-aortic linear artifacts in a cohort of patients with suspected AD or TDA, to establish the differential TEE diagnostic criteria between these artifacts and true aortic flaps, and to evaluate their impact on TEE diagnostic accuracy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: During an 8-year period, patients at high risk of AD (n = 261) or TDA (n = 90) who underwent a TEE study and had confirmed final diagnoses were studied. In an initial retrospective series, linear artifacts were observed within the ascending and descending aorta in 59 of 230 patients (26%) and 17 of 230 patients (7%), respectively. TEE findings associated with linear artifacts in the ascending aorta were as follows: displacement parallel to aortic walls; similar blood flow velocities on both sides; angle with the aortic wall > 85 degrees; and thickness > 2.5 mm. Diagnostic criteria of reverberant images in the descending aorta were as follows: displacement parallel to aortic walls, overimposition of blood flow, and similar blood flow velocities on both sides of the image. In a subsequent prospective series (n = 121), systematic use of these diagnostic criteria resulted in improved TEE specificity for the identification of true intra-aortic flaps.
CONCLUSIONS: Misleading intra-aortic linear artifacts are frequently observed in patients undergoing a TEE study for suspected AD or TDA. Routine use of the herein-proposed diagnostic criteria promises to further improve TEE diagnostic accuracy in the setting of severely ill patients with potential need for prompt surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11399705     DOI: 10.1378/chest.119.6.1778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Perioperative echocardiography: basic principles].

Authors:  M Nowak; P Rosenberger; T W Felbinger; A E Götz; S K Shernan; K Unertl; H K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Fact or Artifact in Two-Dimensional Echocardiography: Avoiding Misdiagnosis and Missed Diagnosis.

Authors:  Philippe B Bertrand; Robert A Levine; Eric M Isselbacher; Pieter M Vandervoort
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  Echocardiography in the intensive care unit: from evolution to revolution?

Authors:  Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Michel Slama; Bernard Cholley; Gérard Janvier; Philippe Vignon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Point of care cardiac ultrasound applications in the emergency department and intensive care unit--a review.

Authors:  Robert T Arntfield; Scott J Millington
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-05

5.  Recognition of Ultrasound Artifact Mimicking Pulmonary Artery Dissection in Patients with Heart Disease.

Authors:  Weichun Wu; Na Zhang; David H Hsi; Lili Niu; Yong Jiang; Yang Wang; Zhenhui Zhu; Hao Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The 'cardiac-lung mass' artifact: an echocardiographic sign of lung atelectasis and/or pleural effusion.

Authors:  Andreas Karabinis; Theodosios Saranteas; Dimitrios Karakitsos; Daniel Lichtenstein; John Poularas; Clifford Yang; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.