Literature DB >> 11399564

Bone Marrow Transplantation: Prognostic Factors of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization with Cyclophosphamide and Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF): The CD34+ Cell Dose Positively Affects the Time to Hematopoietic Recovery and Supportive Requirements after High-Dose Chemotherapy.

C. Solá1, P. Maroto, R. Salazar, R. Mesía, L. Mendoza, J. Brunet, A. López-Pousa, J. M. Tabernero, J. Montesinos, C. Pericay, C. Martínez, J. A. Cancelas, J. J. López-López.   

Abstract

To prospectively analyze factors that influence peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection and hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC), 39 patients received cyclophosphamide 4 g/m(2) and rHuG-CSF (Filgrastim) 5 &amp;mgr;g/kg/day. Leukapheresis was started when CD34(+) cells/mL were > 5 x 10(3). A minimum of 2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg was collected. Median steady-state bone marrow CD34(+) cell percentage was 0.8% (range, 0.1 to 6). Thirty-two patients received HDC with autologous PBSC transplantation plus Filgrastim. A median of 2 (range, 0 to 6) leukapheresis per patient were performed and a median of 6.3 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg (range, 0 to 44.4) collected; four patients failed to mobilize CD34(+) cells. The number of cycles of prior chemotherapy had an inverse correlation with the number CD34(+) cells/kg collected (r = -0.38; p < 0.005). Patients with <7 cycles had a higher predictability for onset of leukapheresis than patients with (3) 7 (93% versus 50%; p < 0.005). The four patients who failed to mobilize had received >/=7 cycles. The number of CD34(+) cells/kg infused after HDC had an inverse correlation with days to recovery to 0.5 x 10(9) neutrophils/L and 20 x 10(9) platelets/L (r = -0.68 and -0.56; p < 0.005). The effect of these factors on mobilization and hematopoietic recovery were confirmed by multivariate analysis. Requirements for supportive measures were significantly lower in patients given a higher dose of CD34(+) cells/kg. Therefore, PBSC collection should be planned early in the course of chemotherapy. Larger number of CD34(+) cells/kg determined a more rapid hematopoietic recovery and a decrease of required supportive measures.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11399564     DOI: 10.1080/10245332.1999.11746443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematology        ISSN: 1024-5332            Impact factor:   2.269


  9 in total

1.  On how Rac controls hematopoietic stem cell activity.

Authors:  J A Cancelas
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use.

Authors:  Lauren Veltri; Aaron Cumpston; Alexandra Shillingburg; Sijin Wen; Jin Luo; Sonia Leadmon; Kathy Watkins; Michael Craig; Mehdi Hamadani; Abraham S Kanate
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.414

3.  Aerobic exercise in humans mobilizes HSCs in an intensity-dependent manner.

Authors:  Jeff M Baker; Joshua P Nederveen; Gianni Parise
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-11-23

4.  Very high efficacy of intermediate-dose cytarabine in combination with G-CSF as a second-line mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Tomasz Kruzel; Maria Sadus-Wojciechowska; Jacek Najda; Tomasz Czerw; Magdalena Glowala-Kosinska; Jerzy Holowiecki; Sebastian Giebel
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  Plerixafor: a review of its use in stem-cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Plerixafor mobilization leads to a lower ratio of CD34+ cells to total nucleated cells which results in greater storage costs.

Authors:  Yvette C Tanhehco; Jill Adamski; Mary Sell; Kathleen Cunningham; Christa Eisenmann; Deborah Magee; Edward A Stadtmauer; Una O'Doherty
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  A randomized clinical trial comparing granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor administration sites for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells for patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Heather Renfroe; Mike Arnold; Louette Vaughn; R Donald Harvey; Ellie Hamilton; Sagar Lonial; H Jean Khoury; Jonathan L Kaufman; Mary Jo Lechowicz; Christopher R Flowers; Edmund K Waller
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Stem cell mobilization in HIV seropositive patients with lymphoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Re; Chiara Cattaneo; Cristina Skert; Pascual Balsalobre; Mariagrazia Michieli; Mark Bower; Andrés J M Ferreri; Marcus Hentrich; José M Ribera; Bernardino Allione; Philipp Schommers; Silvia Montoto; Camillo Almici; Pierino Ferremi; Mario Mazzucato; Salvatore Gattillo; Salvatore Casari; Michele Spina; José L Diez-Martin; Umberto Tirelli; Giuseppe Rossi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  The High Effect of Chemomobilization with High-Dose Etopside + Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor in Autologous Hematopoietic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Şebnem Izmir Güner; Mustafa Teoman Yanmaz; Ahmet Selvi; Cigdem Usul
Journal:  Hematol Rep       Date:  2016-03-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.