Literature DB >> 11399417

Supply and demand for alcohol in Australia: relationships between industry structures, regulation and the marketplace.

T Stockwell1, D Crosbie.   

Abstract

Aspects of alcohol supply and demand relationships are examined in relation to the two main beverage varieties in Australia, wine and beer. It is argued that this case study illustrates how the 'supply side' is able to create and protect demand for alcohol through both taking advantage of and influencing government regulation of the market for alcohol. In relation to low alcohol beer the impact on public health and safety has been extremely positive. In relation to the creation of cask wine in the late 1960s there have been demonstrably deleterious effects. Preferential taxation arrangements for the Australian wine industry have dramatically increased both exports and home consumption. One unintended consequence has been the creation of a major new market for cheap bulk wines that have had a devastating public health impact, particularly on Aboriginal communities, and also the invention of 'alco-pops'. Two-thirds of all table wine consumed in Australia now comes in a cask and 90% of this product is manufactured by three multi-national companies that wield enormous power and political influence to maintain the status quo. The Australian beer industry is well known internationally for its export of 'full strength' (around 5% by volume) beers. What is less well known is its commercial success in the development of low and mid-strength varieties for home consumption. In some States these now comprise 40% by volume of the beer market. This development can largely be attributed to State taxation arrangements, to drink-driving law enforcement, marketing strategies and to a decade of intense competition between several major brewers. This case study indicates how alcohol taxation policy can have major impacts on public health (both positive and negative) but that in a modern market economy it is difficult for governments to act in the public interest due to pressures from vested interest groups.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11399417     DOI: 10.1016/s0955-3959(01)00079-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Drug Policy        ISSN: 0955-3959


  4 in total

1.  What did you drink yesterday? Public health relevance of a recent recall method used in the 2004 Australian National Drug Strategy Household Survey.

Authors:  Tim Stockwell; Jinhui Zhao; Tanya Chikritzhs; Tom K Greenfield
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Are Lower-Strength Beers Gateways to Higher-Strength Beers? Time Series Analyses of Household Purchases from 64,280 British Households, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Eva Jané Llopis; Amy O'Donnell; Eileen Kaner; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Public Health Surveillance Studies of Alcohol Industry Market and Political Strategies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; Rachel Coleman; Julie McEachern
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Drink, but don't drive? The alcohol industry's involvement in global road safety.

Authors:  Connie Hoe; Niloufer Taber; Sarah Champagne; Abdulgafoor M Bachani
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.