Literature DB >> 11399350

Error-negativity and positivity as they relate to other ERP indices of attentional control and stimulus processing.

P L Davies1, S J Segalowitz, J Dywan, P E Pailing.   

Abstract

We compared individual differences in the ERP associated with incorrect responses in a discrimination task with other ERP components associated with attentional control and stimulus discrimination (N2, P3, CNV). Trials with errors that are detected by the subject normally produce a negativity (N(E)) immediately following the response followed by a positivity (P(E)). The morphology of the N(E) and the P(E) is similar to that of the standard N2-P3 complex on correct discrimination trials. Our findings suggest that the P(E) is a P3 response to the internal detection of errors. The N(E), however, appears to be distinct from the N2. Finally, even though both the contingent negative variation (CNV) and the N(E) are associated with prefrontal cortex and the allocation of attention to response accuracy, the N(E) and CNV did not relate to one another.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11399350     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(01)00080-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  27 in total

1.  Neural response to action and reward prediction errors: Comparing the error-related negativity to behavioral errors and the feedback-related negativity to reward prediction violations.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Potts; Laura E Martin; Siri-Maria Kamp; Emanuel Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Error monitoring dysfunction across the illness course of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Veronica B Perez; Judith M Ford; Brian J Roach; Scott W Woods; Thomas H McGlashan; Vinod H Srihari; Rachel L Loewy; Sophia Vinogradov; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-11-07

3.  Self-efficacy effects on neuroelectric and behavioral indices of action monitoring in older adults.

Authors:  Jason R Themanson; Charles H Hillman; Edward McAuley; Sarah M Buck; Shawna E Doerksen; Katherine S Morris; Matthew B Pontifex
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Electrocortical and behavioral measures of response monitoring in young children during a Go/No-Go task.

Authors:  Dana C Torpey; Greg Hajcak; Jiyon Kim; Autumn Kujawa; Daniel N Klein
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Test-Retest Reliability of Electroencephalographic Measures of Performance Monitoring in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Mei-Heng Lin; Patricia L Davies; Jaclyn Stephens; William J Gavin
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Acetaminophen attenuates error evaluation in cortex.

Authors:  Daniel Randles; Julia W Y Kam; Steven J Heine; Michael Inzlicht; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  The relation of self-efficacy and error-related self-regulation.

Authors:  Jason R Themanson; Matthew B Pontifex; Charles H Hillman; Edward McAuley
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Dissociation of preparatory attention and response monitoring maturation during adolescence.

Authors:  M L Padilla; A Pfefferbaum; E V Sullivan; F C Baker; I M Colrain
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Neural correlates of performance monitoring in chronic cannabis users and cannabis-naive controls.

Authors:  Daniel J Fridberg; Patrick D Skosnik; William P Hetrick; Brian F O'Donnell
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.153

10.  Electrophysiological correlates of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects: evidence for response conflict.

Authors:  Bettina Forster; Enea F Pavone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.