Literature DB >> 11398745

Hydrodynamic drag of diving birds: effects of body size, body shape and feathers at steady speeds.

J Lovvorn1, G A Liggins, M H Borstad, S M Calisal, J Mikkelsen.   

Abstract

For birds diving to depths where pressure has mostly reduced the buoyancy of air spaces, hydrodynamic drag is the main mechanical cost of steady swimming. Drag is strongly affected by body size and shape, so such differences among species should affect energy costs. Because flow around the body is complicated by the roughness and vibration of feathers, feathers must be considered in evaluating the effects of size and shape on drag. We investigated the effects of size, shape and feathers on the drag of avian divers ranging from wing-propelled auklets weighing 75 g to foot-propelled eiders weighing up to 2060 g. Laser scanning of body surfaces yielded digitized shapes that were averaged over several specimens per species and then used by a milling machine to cut foam models. These models were fitted with casts of the bill area, and their drag was compared with that of frozen specimens. Because of the roughness and vibration of the feathers, the drag of the frozen birds was 2-6 times that of the models. Plots of drag coefficient (C(D)) versus Reynolds number (Re) differed between the model and the frozen birds, with the pattern of difference varying with body shape. Thus, the drag of cast models or similar featherless shapes can differ both quantitatively and qualitatively from that of real birds. On the basis of a new towing method with no posts or stings that alter flow or angles of attack, the dimensionless C(D)/Re curves differed among a size gradient of five auklet species (75-100g) with similar shapes. Thus, extrapolation of C(D)/Re curves among related species must be performed with caution. At lower speeds, the C(D) at a given Re was generally higher for long-necked birds that swim with their neck extended (cormorants, grebes, some ducks) than for birds that swim with their head retracted (penguins, alcids), but this trend was reversed at high speeds. Because swimming birds actually travel at a range of instantaneous speeds during oscillatory strokes, species variations in drag at different speeds must be considered in the context of accelerational stroking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11398745     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.9.1547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

1.  Repeated evolution of drag reduction at the air-water interface in diving kingfishers.

Authors:  K E Crandell; R O Howe; P L Falkingham
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Long necks enhance and constrain foraging capacity in aquatic vertebrates.

Authors:  Rory P Wilson; Agustina Gómez-Laich; Juan-Emilio Sala; Giacomo Dell'Omo; Mark D Holton; Flavio Quintana
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The relationship between sternum variation and mode of locomotion in birds.

Authors:  Talia M Lowi-Merri; Roger B J Benson; Santiago Claramunt; David C Evans
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 7.431

4.  Modelling foraging movements of diving predators: a theoretical study exploring the effect of heterogeneous landscapes on foraging efficiency.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Kamil A Bartoń; Beth E Scott; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Taking movement data to new depths: Inferring prey availability and patch profitability from seabird foraging behavior.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Thomas Cornulier; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Ian M Davies; Justin M J Travis; Beth E Scott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.