Literature DB >> 11398172

Tumor characteristics in screening for prostate cancer with and without rectal examination as an initial screening test at low PSA (0.0-3.9 ng/ml).

A N Vis1, R F Hoedemaeker, M Roobol, T H van der Kwast, F H Schröder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The value of rectal examination as initial screening test for prostate cancer at low PSA values (0.0-3.9 ng/ml) was determined by evaluating the number and tumor characteristics of the cancers detected.
METHODS: Two study populations were subjected to screening with (n = 10,226) and without (n = 10,753) rectal examination as initial screening test. The number of cancers detected at low PSA values for both screening regimens, the corresponding biopsy and radical prostatectomy tumor characteristics were assessed. Possibly harmless cancers were defined as small (< 0.5 ml) organ-confined tumors without Gleason growth-patterns 4/5.
RESULTS: At low PSA, 26.6% (117/440) of screen-detected cancers were detected after the evaluation of a suspicious rectal examination. The number of cancers and tumor aggressiveness features were highly associated with serum-PSA level. The proportion of possibly harmless disease steadily declined from 100% (PSA 0.0-0.9 ng/ml) to 15.4% (PSA 3.0-3.9 ng/ml). Rectal examinations were performed unnecessarily in 94.7-100% of cases, when detection of clinically significant disease was aimed at. Using PSA (and a cut-off of 3.0 ng/ml) as the only screening tool, 24.3% (121/498) of screen-detected cancers were in the PSA range 3.0-3.9 ng/ml, and 60.0% were assessed as clinically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Rectal examination as initial screening test for prostate cancer at low PSA values may be replaced by screening using serum-PSA only. At PSA levels below 3.0 ng/ml, 289 rectal examinations are required to find one case of clinically significant disease, and 96 rectal examinations are needed to diagnose prostate cancer of any size, grade, or stage. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11398172     DOI: 10.1002/pros.1069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  7 in total

1.  Individualized screening interval for prostate cancer based on prostate-specific antigen level: results of a prospective, randomized, population-based study.

Authors:  Gunnar Aus; Jan-Erik Damber; Ali Khatami; Hans Lilja; Johan Stranne; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-12

2.  Comparison of observed biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with low PSA values undergoing radical prostatectomy and predictions of preoperative nomogram.

Authors:  Ryan K Berglund; Andrew J Stephenson; Angel M Cronin; Andrew J Vickers; James A Eastham; Eric A Klein; Bertrand D Guillonneau
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Optimal baseline prostate-specific antigen level to distinguish risk of prostate cancer in healthy men between 40 and 69 years of age.

Authors:  Kyung Kgi Park; Seung Hwan Lee; Young Deuk Choi; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Why I cannot find the prostate? Behind the subjectivity of rectal exam.

Authors:  Dmitry Koulikov; Ariel Mamber; Alon Fridmans; Wael Abu Arafeh; Ofer Z Shenfeld
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2012-02-15

5.  Contemporary outcomes in the detection of prostate cancer using transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core biopsy in Singaporean men with elevated prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Alvin Lee; Sing Joo Chia
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-09-03

6.  Multi-marker testing for cancer: what can we learn from modern prenatal testing for Trisomy-21.

Authors:  Erasmus Schneider; Gerald Mizejewski
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-09

7.  Prediction models for prostate cancer to be used in the primary care setting: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammad Aladwani; Artitaya Lophatananon; William Ollier; Kenneth Muir
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.