Literature DB >> 1139755

Response of the left ventricle in coronary artery disease to postextrasystolic potentiation.

R I Hamby, A Aintablian, G Wisoff, M L Hartstein.   

Abstract

Left ventricular volumes and contractile patterns were evaluated during the first sinus beat after a compensatory pause resulting from ventricular arrhythmia and were compared to the second sinus beat (control beat) in order to evaluate the effect of postextrasystolic potentiation. Twelve patients had no evidence of heart disease (group I). Fifty patients had coronary artery disease and included 14 patients (group IIa) with no prior myocardial infarction and a normal left ventricular contractile pattern and 19 pateints (group IIb) with an abnormal contractile pattern. Seventeen pateints (group IIc) had a documented transmural myocardial infarction as well as an abnormal left ventricular contractile pattern. In all patients the first postextrasystolic sinus beat, when compared to the second sinus beat, demonstrated increases in stroke volume and ejection fraction and decrease in end-systolic volume. There were no qualitative changes in the contractile pattern in the immediate postextrasystolic beat in the patients with normal left ventricular function. In both group IIb and group IIc the changes in end-systolic volume, stroke volume and ejection fraction were significantly greater than observed in groups I and IIa. Abnormal wall segments present in the control beat in groups IIb and IIc demonstrated after postextrasystolic potentiation a normal contractile pattern, improved pattern or no change when compared to the control beat. Abnormal wall segments were more likely to revert to normal as a result of postextrasystolic potentiation in group IIb than group IIc. Akinesia was less likely to revert completely to normal than hyposinesia. In 20 of 24 patients the changes in contractile pattern after aortocoronary bypass surgery corresponded to those observed as a result of postextrasystolic potentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1139755     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.51.3.428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  16 in total

Review 1.  Clinical implications of the interval-force relationship of the heart.

Authors:  S M Hardman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Effect of postextrasystolic potentiation on amplitude and timing of regional left ventricular wall motion in ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  D G Gibson; E Fleck; W Rudolph
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1983-05

3.  Determination of left ventricular residual function by analysis of post-extrasystolic beat in mitral stenosis.

Authors:  P D Papadopoulos; P C Toutouzas; G Spanos; C Kourouklis; A S Papadopoulos; D G Avgoustaskis
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1984-03

4.  Failure of aneurysmectomy to improve left ventricular function.

Authors:  M Sesto; F Schwarz; K U Thiedemann; W Flameng; M Schlepper
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1979-01

5.  [Problems of angiographic determination of diastolic pressure-volume relationship of the left ventricle (author's transl)].

Authors:  L J Ulbricht; J Jehle; F K Schmiel; P Spiller
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 17.165

6.  Influence of timing of the extrasystolic beat on the extent of postextrasystolic potentiation in the intact human left ventricle.

Authors:  H Katus; H C Mehmel; K von Olshausen; B Stockins; W Kübler
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 17.165

7.  Postextrasystolic potentiation in patients with ischaemic heart disease: influence of inotropic agents.

Authors:  Y I Zhang; R H Ritchie; J D Horowitz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Effects of nitroglycerin, postextrasystolic potentiation, and pacing-induced ischaemia on wall motion in patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  F Schwartz; R Ensslen; J Thormann; M Sesto
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1977-01

Review 9.  Stunning: damaging or protective to the myocardium?

Authors:  R Ferrari; O Visioli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 10.  Clinical relevance of myocardial "stunning".

Authors:  R Bolli; C J Hartley; R S Rabinovitz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.