Literature DB >> 11396751

A comparative study of caudal bupivacaine and midazolam-bupivacaine mixture for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing genitourinary surgery.

R Mahajan1, Y K Batra, V K Grover, J Kajal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of caudal midazolam-bupivacaine combination in providing post-operative pain relief in children undergoing genitourinary surgery and to study the occurrence of adverse effects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty children, aged 2 to 8 years, scheduled for genitourinary surgery were allocated randomly to receive either 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml/kg (group B; n = 15) or 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml/kg with 50 microg/kg midazolam (group BM; n = 15) by the caudal route immediately after induction of general anesthesia. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure and oxygen saturation were monitored throughout the study period. Postoperative pain was assessed at regular intervals for 12 hours using an objective pain score. Analgesia was supplemented whenever the pain score was > or = 4. Duration of analgesia, as well as the requirement of additional analgesics, were noted.
RESULTS: Lowest pain scores were observed with the addition of midazolam to caudal bupivacaine (p < 0.01). Duration of analgesia was longer in group BM (11 +/- 0.5 h) as compared to group B (7.4 +/- 2.1 hours) (p < 0.05). Fewer children (26.6%) required additional analgesia in the combination group whereas in group B, 60% of the children received analgesic supplements within 6 hours after surgery (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation in both groups. We observed no untoward event in either of the groups.
CONCLUSION: Caudal administration of bupivacaine-midazolam mixture prolongs post-operative analgesia compared to bupivacaine alone without causing any adverse effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11396751     DOI: 10.5414/cpp39116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0946-1965            Impact factor:   1.366


  8 in total

1.  Efficacy of midazolam addition to local anesthetic in peribulbar block : Randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Ibrahim; E Gomaa
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Neuraxial analgesia in neonates and infants: a review of clinical and preclinical strategies for the development of safety and efficacy data.

Authors:  Suellen M Walker; Tony L Yaksh
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  The efficacy of adding dexamethasone, midazolam, or epinephrine to 0.5% bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Authors:  Ghada F El-Baradey; Nagat S Elshmaa
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-11

4.  Comparative study of caudal clonidine and midazolam added to bupivacaine during infra-umbilical surgeries in children.

Authors:  Sadhana Sanwatsarkar; Sahil Kapur; Dipti Saxena; Gaurav Yadav; Nagina Naz Khan
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

5.  A randomized-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of caudal midazolam, ketamine and neostigmine as adjuvants to bupivacaine on postoperative analgesic in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Musa Shirmohammadie; Alireza Ebrahim Soltani; Shahriar Arbabi; Karim Nasseri
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-01-15

6.  The effects of single-dose rectal midazolam application on postoperative recovery, sedation, and analgesia in children given caudal anesthesia plus bupivacaine.

Authors:  Sedat Saylan; Ahmet Eroglu; Davut Dohman
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The Analgesic Efficacy of Intrathecal Bupivacaine and Fentanyl with Added Neostigmine or Magnesium Sulphate.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mokaram Dori; Farid Foruzin
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-09-18

8.  Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends.

Authors:  Amlan Swain; Deb Sanjay Nag; Seelora Sahu; Devi Prasad Samaddar
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.337

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.