Literature DB >> 11396576

Insights into population ecology and sexual selection in snakes through the application of DNA-based genetic markers.

H L Gibbs1, P J Weatherhead.   

Abstract

Hypervariable genetic markers have revolutionized studies of kinship, behavioral ecology, and population biology in vertebrate groups such as birds, but their use in snakes remains limited. To illustrate the value of such markers in snakes, we review studies that have used microsatellite DNA loci to analyze local population differentiation and parentage in snakes. Four ecologically distinct species of snakes all show evidence for differentiation at small spatial scales (2-15 km), but with substantial differences among species. This result highlights how genetic analysis can reveal hidden aspects of the natural history of difficult-to-observe taxa, and it raises important questions about the ecological factors that may contribute to restricted gene flow. A 3-year study of genetic parentage in marked populations of the northern water snake showed that (1) participation in mating aggregations was a poor predictor of genetic-based measures of reproductive success; (2) multiple paternity was high, yet there was no detectable fitness advantage to multiple mating by females; and (3) the opportunity for selection was far higher in males than in females due to a larger variance in male reproductive success, and yet this resulted in no detectable selection on morphological variation in males. Thus genetic markers have provided accurate measures of individual reproductive success in this species, an important step toward resolving the adaptive significance of key features including multiple paternity and reversed sexual size dimorphism. Overall these studies illustrate how genetic analyses of snakes provide previously unobtainable information of long-standing interest to behavioral ecologists.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11396576     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/92.2.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  7 in total

1.  Spatial genetic analysis and long-term mark-recapture data demonstrate male-biased dispersal in a snake.

Authors:  J Scott Keogh; Jonathan K Webb; Richard Shine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Fine-scale population genetic structure and sex-biased dispersal in the smooth snake (Coronella austriaca) in southern England.

Authors:  A P Pernetta; J A Allen; T J C Beebee; C J Reading
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  The Alapahoochee watershed microgeographic structure and its potential influence on metal concentrations and genetic structure in the Florida cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus conanti, within the watershed.

Authors:  Joseph Ashley Kirkly; Gretchen K Bielmyer-Fraser; John F Elder; David L Bechler
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Multiple paternity in Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus L.) assessed with microsatellite markers.

Authors:  R Streiff; S Mira; M Castro; M L Cancela
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Conservation genetics of the eastern yellow-bellied racer (Coluber constrictor flaviventris) and bullsnake (Pituophis catenifer sayi): River valleys are critical features for snakes at northern range limits.

Authors:  Christopher M Somers; Carly F Graham; Jessica A Martino; Timothy R Frasier; Stacey L Lance; Laura E Gardiner; Ray G Poulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mating systems, reproductive success, and sexual selection in secretive species: a case study of the western diamond-backed rattlesnake, Crotalus atrox.

Authors:  Rulon W Clark; Gordon W Schuett; Roger A Repp; Melissa Amarello; Charles F Smith; Hans-Werner Herrmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genetic mating system and mate selection in smallmouth bass.

Authors:  Ryan P Franckowiak; Mark S Ridgway; Chris C Wilson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.