Literature DB >> 11395228

Radiation dose response in patients with favorable localized prostate cancer (Stage T1-T2, biopsy Gleason < or = 6, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen < or = 10).

P A Kupelian1, J C Buchsbaum, C A Reddy, E A Klein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the radiation dose response as determined by biochemical relapse-free survival in patients with favorable localized prostate cancers, i.e., Stage T1-T2, biopsy Gleason score (bGS) < or = 6, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) < or = 10 ng/mL. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 292 patients with favorable localized prostate cancer were treated with radiotherapy alone between 1986 and 1999. The median age was 69 years. Sixteen percent of cases (n = 46) were African-American. The distribution by clinical T stage was as follows: T1/T2A, 243 (83%); and T2B/T2C, 49 (17%). The distribution by iPSA was as follows: < or = 4 ng/mL, 49 (17%); and > 4 ng/mL, 243 (83%). The mean iPSA level was 6.2 (median, 6.4). The distribution by bGS was as follows: or = 5 in 89 cases (30%) and 6 in 203 cases (70%). The median radiation dose was 70.0 Gy (range, 63.0-78.0 Gy). Doses of < or = 70.0 Gy were delivered in 175 cases, 70.2-72.0 Gy in 24 cases, 74 Gy in 30 cases, and 78 Gy in 63 cases. For patients receiving < 72 Gy, the median dose was 68 Gy, vs. 78 Gy for patients receiving > or = 72 Gy. A conformal technique was used in 129 (44%) of cases. The median follow-up was 43 months (range, 3-153).
RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the projected 5- and 8-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rates were both 81%. For patients receiving > or = 72 Gy, the 5- and 8-year bRFS rates were both 95% vs. only 77% for patients receiving < 72 Gy, p = 0.010. For patients receiving 74 Gy, the 4-year bRFS rate was 94% vs. 96% for patients receiving 78 Gy, p = 0.90. A multivariate analysis for factors affecting bRFS rates using Cox proportional hazards was performed for all cases using the following variables: age (continuous variable), race (black vs. white), iPSA (continuous variable), bGS (< or = 5 vs. 6), Stage (T1-2A vs. T2B-C), radiation dose (continuous variable), and radiation technique (conformal vs. standard). From the multivariate analysis, only iPSA (p = 0.017, chi(2) = 5.7), and radiation dose (p = 0.021, chi(2) = 5.3) were independent predictors of outcome. Age (p = 0.94), race (p = 0.89), stage (p = 0.45), biopsy GS (p = 0.40), and radiation technique (p = 0.45) were not.
CONCLUSION: There is a clear radiation dose response in patients with favorable localized prostate cancers (i.e., Stage T1-T2, biopsy Gleason score < or = 6, and iPSA < or = 10 ng/mL). At least 74 Gy should be delivered to the prostate and periprostatic tissues. With our cohort of patients, longer follow-up will be needed to assess the importance of doses exceeding 74 Gy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11395228     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01466-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

Review 1.  External beam radiation therapy: role of androgen deprivation.

Authors:  Patrick Kupelian
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Radiotherapy of prostate cancer].

Authors:  S Krause; K Herfarth
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  70 Gy or more: which dose for which prostate cancer?

Authors:  U Ganswindt; F Paulsen; A G Anastasiadis; A Stenzl; M Bamberg; C Belka
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Parameters favorable to intraprostatic radiation dose escalation in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nadine Housri; Holly Ning; John Ondos; Peter Choyke; Kevin Camphausen; Deborah Citrin; Barbara Arora; Uma Shankavaram; Aradhana Kaushal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  What dose of external-beam radiation is high enough for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Thomas N Eade; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Gerald E Hanks; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Combination of celecoxib with percutaneous radiotherapy in patients with localised prostate cancer - a phase I study.

Authors:  U Ganswindt; W Budach; V Jendrossek; G Becker; M Bamberg; C Belka
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy for high risk prostate cancer based on sentinel node SPECT imaging for target volume definition.

Authors:  Ute Ganswindt; Frank Paulsen; Stefan Corvin; Kai Eichhorn; Stefan Glocker; Ilse Hundt; Mattias Birkner; Markus Alber; Aristotelis Anastasiadis; Arnulf Stenzl; Roland Bares; Wilfried Budach; Michael Bamberg; Claus Belka
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Radiotherapy for t3 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Bayley; Mary K Gospodarowicz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.862

9.  Hypofractionated helical tomotherapy (75 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: long-term analysis of gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity.

Authors:  Moonkyoo Kong; Seong Eon Hong; Sung-Goo Chang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Preliminary result of carbon-ion radiotherapy using the spot scanning method for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Takakusagi; Hiroyuki Katoh; Kio Kano; Wataru Anno; Keisuke Tsuchida; Nobutaka Mizoguchi; Itsuko Serizawa; Daisaku Yoshida; Tadashi Kamada
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.