Literature DB >> 1139486

Nurse practitioners in primary care iv. Impact of an interdisciplinary team on attitudes of a rural population.

G M Batchelor, W O Spitzer, A E Comley, G D Anderson.   

Abstract

Attitudes toward the expanded role of nurse practitioners in primary care (family practice nurses) have been determined for persons from a semirural area who chose as their principal souce of care an interdisciplinary family medical centre (FMC) incorporating two nurse practitioners, and those for whom the FMC was not the usual source of care. Data were obtaine using"before-and-after" structured interviews of a random sample of persons living in a southern Ontario township. Slowly evolving, nonsignificant trends of greater acceptance were observed among patiens who had dealth with family practice nurses. The greatest change observed was an increased acceptance of the nnurse by FMC users as the person who would be contacted as a second choice if theirfirst choice, usually a physician, could not be reached in specific worrry-inducing situations. FMC users depended more on nurses to provide information. A conclusion of increased general acceptance of the family practive nurse by FMC users is supported by a 34 per cent higher use of nurses by FMC patients compared to other persons of comparable characteristics living in the same community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1139486      PMCID: PMC1956250     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  5 in total

1.  Patient attitudes to the expanded role of the nurse in family practice.

Authors:  R E Lees; R M Anderson
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1971-12-04       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The Burlington randomized trial of the nurse practitioner.

Authors:  W O Spitzer; D L Sackett; J C Sibley; R S Roberts; M Gent; D J Kergin; B C Hackett; A Olynich
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The importance of coding presenting symptoms.

Authors:  S T Bain; W B Spaulding
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1967-10-14       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Nurse clinics and progressive ambulatory patient care.

Authors:  C E Lewis; B A Resnik
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1967-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Nurse practitioners in primary care. I. The McMaster University educational program.

Authors:  W O Spitzer; D J Kergin
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1973-04-21       Impact factor: 8.262

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  An evaluation of a remote, rural clinic manned by a physician's assistant.

Authors:  R F Hill; J G Greenwood; F S Wert
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  The development and application of indices of health: general methods and a summary of results.

Authors:  D L Sackett; L W Chambers; A S MacPherson; C H Goldsmith; R G Mcauley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Nurse practitioners in primary care. VII. A cohort study of 99 nurses and 79 associated physicians.

Authors:  K Scherer; F Fortin; W O Spitzer; D J Kergin
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-04-23       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  The family practice nurse.

Authors:  K Hodgkin
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-04-23       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Nurse practitioners in primary care. VI. Assessment of their deployment with the Utilization and Financial Index.

Authors:  W O Spitzer; R S Roberts; T Delmore
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1976-06-19       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Nurse practitioners in primary care. V. Development of the utilization and financial index to measure effects of their deployment.

Authors:  W O Spitzer; R S Roberts; T Delmore
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1976-06-19       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Illness prevention and health promotion services provided by nurse practitioners: predicting potential consumers.

Authors:  N J Pender; A R Pender
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists: what is the quality of the evidence?

Authors:  Faith Donald; Kelley Kilpatrick; Kim Reid; Nancy Carter; Ruth Martin-Misener; Denise Bryant-Lukosius; Patricia Harbman; Sharon Kaasalainen; Deborah A Marshall; Renee Charbonneau-Smith; Erin E Donald; Monique Lloyd; Abigail Wickson-Griffiths; Jennifer Yost; Pamela Baxter; Esther Sangster-Gormley; Pamela Hubley; Célyne Laflamme; Marsha Campbell-Yeo; Sheri Price; Jennifer Boyko; Alba DiCenso
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2014-09-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.