Literature DB >> 11394459

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the lessons learned.

B Guillonneau1, X Cathelineau, J D Doublet, G Vallancien.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the operative, oncologic, and functional results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy based on an initial series of 350 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1998 and May 2000, 350 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy according to our technique. The study of operative morbidity was based on all intraoperative and postoperative complications. The oncologic assessment was based on clinical, laboratory, and intraoperative and postoperative pathological data. Postoperative functional results were assessed by the ICS-male self-administered questionnaire.
RESULTS: No deaths were observed in this series. Conversion was required in seven cases, exclusively among the first 70 patients. The mean operating time was 217 +/- 59 minutes, including the lymphadenectomy phase that was considered necessary in 21.4% of patients, and 195 +/- 56 minutes for the most recent 200 patients. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 354 +/- 250 mL. The overall transfusion rate was 5.7% and 2.8% in the last 250 patients. Intraoperative complications were reported in 14 patients (4%), and the reoperation rate was 3.7%. The mean postoperative bladder catheterization time was 5.8 +/- 3.3 days, and the catheter could be removed before the 5th day in 41% of patients. The mean hospital stay was 6 +/- 3.9 postoperative days (range 2-33 days). By pathologic stage, the positive surgical margin rate was 3.6% for pT2a specimens (3 patients), 14% for pT2b specimens (29 patients), 33% for pT3a specimens (12 patients), and 43.5% for pT3b specimens (10 patients). In the first 75 patients with pT2N0/Nx negative-margin specimens and a follow-up of >12 months, the PSA concentrations was <0.2 ng/mL in 92% of patients. The continence rate (no protection necessary either during the day or at night) among the first 133 patients was 85.5% and the postoperative erection rate was 59% among 22 selected consecutive patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the value, in our experience, of the laparoscopic approach to radical prostatectomy, which allows satisfactory cancer control associated with low perioperative morbidity and encouraging functional results in terms both of continence and erectile function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11394459     DOI: 10.1089/089277901300189510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series.

Authors:  András Hoznek; David B Samadi; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre De La Taille; Leif E Olsson; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Single-centre study comparing standard apical dissection with a modified technique to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Xiao-Yong Pu; Jie Si-Tu; Wen-Tao Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Treatment- and disease-related complications of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anne R Simoneau
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

5.  The single-knot method with Lapra-Ty clips is useful for training surgeons in vesicourethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Yasui; Yasunori Itoh; Tetsuji Maruyama; Hidetoshi Akita; Yoshihiro Hashimoto; Keiichi Tozawa; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Japanese experience with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Isao Hara; Gaku Kawabata
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience.

Authors:  Prem Nath Dogra; Ashish Kumar Saini; Prabhjot Singh; Girdhar Bora; Brusabhanu Nayak
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2014-04

Review 8.  Comparison of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy techniques.

Authors:  Renaud Bollens; Thierry Roumeguere; Marc Vanden Bossche; Thierry Quackels; Alexandre R Zlotta; Claude C Schulman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 9.  Does the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach improve the outcome of radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Michael C Truss; Athanasios Bekos; Minh Do; Robert Rabenalt; Christian G Stief; Andras Hoznek; Clément-Claude Abbou; Jochen Neuhaus; Wolfgang Dorschner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Blood loss during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - is it significant or not?

Authors:  Sławomir Poletajew; Artur A Antoniewicz
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2012-03-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.