Literature DB >> 11394338

Separating elective and emergency surgical care (the emergency team).

P D Addison1, A Getgood, S Paterson-Brown.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence on general surgical activity following the separation of elective from emergency surgical care in one large teaching hospital. A prospective audit of elective and emergency general surgical activity between 1994 and 1999 inclusive was carried out. Elective and emergency surgical activity was separated in January 1996, with a dedicated 'Emergency Team' of one consultant for one week, two registrars, two senior house officers and four house officers for two weeks, in addition to a 20 bed acute admission ward and a 24 hour emergency theatre. The consultant cancelled the majority of his/her elective work during the on-call week. A prospective collection was made of all elective and emergency operations carried out between 1994 and 1999 using the Lothian Surgical Audit system. Out of hours operative activity was analysed retrospectively from data collected using the Operating Room Schedule of Surgery (ORSOS) and outpatient clinic and day case activity collected from the Hospital Administration System. Comparisons were made between years 1994/1995 and 1996/7/8/9. Emergency surgical admissions rose by 86% from 1973 patients in 1994 to 3675 in 1999. During the same period, elective in-patient activity remained fairly steady, but there was an increase in day surgery from 469 to 2089 cases per annum. Despite the on-call consultant cancelling his/her outpatient clinics, overall outpatient activity also increased from 9911 to 12,335. However a proportion of this reflects the appointment of two new consultants in April 1998. Emergency operations increased from 941 in 1994 to 1351 in 1999, with a two-fold reduction in operations carried out between 0000-0800 hours from 16% in 1994 to 7.9% in 1999. A separate and dedicated 'Emergency Team' is an efficient method of managing acute general surgical admissions. It permits elective work to carry on uninterrupted, reduces the number of operations performed after midnight, and provides a better environment for teaching and training. This scenario might also be applicable to other medical specialties who have a large emergency commitment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11394338     DOI: 10.1177/003693300104600207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scott Med J        ISSN: 0036-9330            Impact factor:   0.729


  6 in total

1.  Impact of changing trend in cold ischaemic time on operating times in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Ying-Ying Seow; Hany Riad; Philip Dyer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Model-based evaluation of the Canberra Hospital Acute Care Surgical Unit : acute care surgery: a case of one size fits all?

Authors:  C J Beardsley; T Sandhu; S Gubicak; S V Srikanth; K P Galketiya; F Piscioneri
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Classification of hospital admissions into emergency and elective care: a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Jonas Krämer; Jonas Schreyögg; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2017-11-25

Review 4.  A systematic review of dedicated models of care for emergency urological patients.

Authors:  Ned Kinnear; Matheesha Herath; Dylan Barnett; Derek Hennessey; Christopher Dobbins; Tarik Sammour; James Moore
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-06-26

5.  The Effect of Weekend Surgery on Outcomes of Emergency Laparotomy: Experience at a High Volume District General Hospital.

Authors:  Maitreyi S Patel; Joel J Thomas; Xavier Aguayo; Daniel Gutmann; Sayed Haschmat Sarwary; Mehmood Wain
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-27

6.  Improved management of acute gallstone disease after regional surgical subspecialization.

Authors:  D J Simpson; A M Wood; H M Paterson; S J Nixon; S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.