Literature DB >> 11394027

Surgical treatment of constipation and fecal incontinence.

N A Rotholtz1, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

Fecal incontinence is a disabling and distressing condition. Many patients are reluctant to discuss the condition with a physician. A thorough history, good physical examination, and detailed anorectal physiologic investigations can help in the therapeutic decision-making algorithm. Patients with isolated anterior sphincter defects are candidates for overlapping repair. In the presence of unilateral or bilateral pudendal neuropathy, the patient should be counseled preoperatively regarding a [table: see text] lower anticipation of success. If the injury occurred shortly before the planned surgery and neuropathy is present, it may be prudent to wait because neuropathy sometimes can resolve within 6 to 24 months of the injury. Pudendal nerve study may help determine surgical timing. An anterior sphincter defect combined with a rectovaginal fistula can be approached by overlapping sphincter repair and a concomitant transanal advancement flap. Patients who had undergone multiple such procedures may benefit from concomitant fecal diversion at the time of repeat sphincter repair. Patients with global or multifocal sphincter injury may be candidates for a neosphincter procedure. The stimulated graciloplasty and artificial bowel sphincter are reasonable options. In the absence of the availability of these techniques or because of financial constraints, consideration could be given to bilateral gluteoplasty or unilateral or bilateral nonstimulated graciloplasty. The postanal repair still serves a role in patients with isolated decreased resting pressures with or without neuropathy or external sphincter injury with minimal degrees of incontinence. Biofeedback and the Procon device may play a role in these patients. Lastly, fecal diversion must be considered as a means of improving the quality of life because the patient can participate in the activities of daily living without the fear of fecal incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11394027     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8553(05)70171-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8553            Impact factor:   3.806


  7 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiological testing in anorectal disorders.

Authors:  Jose M Remes-Troche; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 2.  Systematic review of surgical options for idiopathic megarectum and megacolon.

Authors:  Marc A Gladman; S Mark Scott; Peter J Lunniss; Norman S Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Is the quality of life better in patients with colostomy than patients with fecal incontience?

Authors:  Patrick Colquhoun; Roberto Kaiser; Jonathan Efron; Eric G Weiss; Juan J Nogueras; Anthony M Vernava; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Advances in diagnostic assessment of fecal incontinence and dyssynergic defecation.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Update on the management of constipation in the elderly: new treatment options.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao; Jorge T Go
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 6.  Epidemiology and management of chronic constipation in elderly patients.

Authors:  Maria Vazquez Roque; Ernest P Bouras
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Colonic irrigation for defecation disorders after dynamic graciloplasty.

Authors:  Sacha M Koch; Ozenç Uludağ; Kadri El Naggar; Wim G van Gemert; Cor G Baeten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 2.571

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.