OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of an ultraportable hand-carried echocardiography system were investigated for assessing ventricular systolic function and severity of mitral valvular regurgitation. METHODS: The study population consisted of 77 consecutive patients (47 men, 30 women, mean age 63 +/- 15 years). Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, left ventricular end-systolic dimension and left ventricular ejection fraction were measured using the hand-carried echo system and the data were compared with measurements by the conventional echocardiography system using simple linear regression analysis. Left ventricular wall motion was compared between the systems using a 16-segment model recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography. Severity of mitral regurgitation was assessed by the distance of the regurgitant signal in the left atrium. RESULTS: Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, left ventricular end-systolic dimension and left ventricular ejection fraction showed good correlations between hand-carried and conventional echo systems (r = 0.94, 0.91 and 0.81, respectively; each p < 0.0001). The accuracy for assessing left ventricular wall motion was 94% (449 of 480 segments). The echo systems also showed the same degree of diagnostic accuracy for severity of mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: The hand-carried echo system provides accurate assessment of left ventricular function and mitral regurgitation simular to conventional echo machines.
OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of an ultraportable hand-carried echocardiography system were investigated for assessing ventricular systolic function and severity of mitral valvular regurgitation. METHODS: The study population consisted of 77 consecutive patients (47 men, 30 women, mean age 63 +/- 15 years). Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, left ventricular end-systolic dimension and left ventricular ejection fraction were measured using the hand-carried echo system and the data were compared with measurements by the conventional echocardiography system using simple linear regression analysis. Left ventricular wall motion was compared between the systems using a 16-segment model recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography. Severity of mitral regurgitation was assessed by the distance of the regurgitant signal in the left atrium. RESULTS: Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, left ventricular end-systolic dimension and left ventricular ejection fraction showed good correlations between hand-carried and conventional echo systems (r = 0.94, 0.91 and 0.81, respectively; each p < 0.0001). The accuracy for assessing left ventricular wall motion was 94% (449 of 480 segments). The echo systems also showed the same degree of diagnostic accuracy for severity of mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: The hand-carried echo system provides accurate assessment of left ventricular function and mitral regurgitation simular to conventional echo machines.