Literature DB >> 11392881

Endocervical status is not predictive of the incidence of cervical cancer in the years after negative smears.

A B Bos1, M van Ballegooijen, M E van den Akker-van Marle, A G Hanselaar, G J van Oortmarssen, J D Habbema.   

Abstract

The clinical relevance of the lack of endocervical cells was never well established in a longitudinal study with histologically proven cervical cancer as an end point. From the Dutch Network and National Database for Pathology, results for all negative smears obtained in 1990 and 1991 in the Netherlands were retrieved, as were data for all cytologic and histologic examinations performed after the negative smears before April 1998. There were no significant differences between the proportion of preinvasive lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1, 2, and 3) detected after negative smears without endocervical cells compared with negative smears with endocervical cells. The proportion of women in whom invasive cancer developed was the same in both groups. These data suggest there is no reason to advise women with negative smears without endocervical cells to undergo an additional smear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11392881     DOI: 10.1309/RP84-MD34-8MFN-39UR

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  5 in total

Review 1.  Management of Papanicolaou test results that lack endocervical cells.

Authors:  Lizette Elumir-Tanner; Meghan Doraty
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands: a tale of two countries.

Authors:  Dik Habbema; Inge M C M De Kok; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Self-collected Pap smears may provide an acceptable and effective method of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Amita A Singla; Paul Komesaroff
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-06

Review 4.  Worldwide incidence of cervical lesions: a systematic review.

Authors:  J Ting; A F Rositch; S M Taylor; L Rahangdale; H M Soeters; X Sun; J S Smith
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cytology and HPV testing for cervical cancer screening: findings from a pilot study.

Authors:  Heidi E Jones; Mahesh M Mansukhani; Guo-Xia Tong; Carolyn L Westhoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.