Literature DB >> 11392339

Pemoline hepatotoxicity and postmarketing surveillance.

D J Safer1, J M Zito, J E Gardner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the numerous reports of hepatotoxic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) ascribed to pemoline that were sent to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1975 and 1996 and to describe the medical community's lack of awareness of these reports.
METHOD: All ADR reports from 1975 through 1996 wherein pemoline was the suspect agent were obtained from the FDA MedWatch Internet site, and some details of nine pemoline-related deaths in youths were obtained directly from the FDA. The published literature on this subject was fully reviewed.
RESULTS: (1) In premarketing clinical trials with pemoline in the early 1970s, hepatic abnormalities were noted in enzyme levels (1%-3% of youths receiving maintenance treatment), during rechallenges (6 of 6), and in biopsies (2 of 2). (2) Between 1975 and 1989, 12 cases of jaundice and 6 deaths in youths ascribed to pemoline hepatotoxicity were reported to the FDA. (3) The first medical literature report of a serious ADR ascribed to pemoline was in a 1989 letter to the editor. (4) Physicians generally only became aware of serious pemoline hepatotoxicity in December 1996. (5) Pemoline use increased until 1997.
CONCLUSION: Limitations in postmarketing surveillance and public reporting in the United States, particularly in the 1980s, largely accounted for delays in an appropriate response to pemoline hepatotoxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11392339     DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200106000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 0890-8567            Impact factor:   8.829


  13 in total

Review 1.  New formulations of stimulants for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Daniel F Connor; Ronald J Steingard
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  Research in child and adolescent psychopharmacology: recent accomplishments and new challenges.

Authors:  Benedetto Vitiello
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Treatment of anxiety and depression in transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  Catherine C Crone; Geoffrey M Gabriel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  A surveillance method for the early identification of idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Fatma A Etwel; Michael J Rieder; John R Bend; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Narcolepsy in the older adult: epidemiology, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Sangeeta S Chakravorty; David B Rye
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in girls: epidemiology and management.

Authors:  Jud Staller; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Pharmacovigilance in children: detecting adverse drug reactions in routine electronic healthcare records. A systematic review.

Authors:  Corri Black; Nara Tagiyeva-Milne; Peter Helms; Dorothy Moir
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Drug therapy of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: current trends.

Authors:  Avinash De Sousa; Gurvinder Kalra
Journal:  Mens Sana Monogr       Date:  2012-01

9.  Off-label psychopharmacologic prescribing for children: history supports close clinical monitoring.

Authors:  Julie M Zito; Albert T Derivan; Christopher J Kratochvil; Daniel J Safer; Joerg M Fegert; Laurence L Greenhill
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.033

10.  Treating adolescents for substance abuse and comorbid psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Paula D Riggs
Journal:  Sci Pract Perspect       Date:  2003-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.