Literature DB >> 11392176

Health services utilization after induced abortions in Ontario: a comparison between community clinics and hospitals.

T Østbye1, E F Wenghofer, C A Woodward, G Gold, J Craighead.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare postabortion health services utilization of hospital abortion patients with community clinic abortion patients using administrative databases. The study was a retrospective cohort study. The study group consisted of patients with induced abortions (n = 41,039) performed in hospitals or community clinics recorded in the 1995 Ontario Health Insurance Plan claims (OHIP) database. An age-matched cohort of 39,220 women who did not undergo induced abortions was selected from the same data source to serve as controls. The main outcome measures were health services utilization indicators constructed from OHIP data within 3 months postabortion from office consultations, emergency room consultations, and hospital admissions. Hospitalization indicators were constructed from Canadian Institute for Health Information hospital discharge data within 3 months postabortion and included data on hospitalizations for infection, certain surgical events, or psychiatric problems. Postabortion health services utilization and hospitalization were higher in the patient population, regardless of service location, than in the age-matched cohort. Within the abortion patient population, hospital day-surgery patients had higher rates of postabortion utilization and hospitalization than did community clinic patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that hospital day surgery patients had a higher risk of subsequent post-abortion hospitalizations for infections (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-2.28), surgical events (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.30-3.24) and psychiatric problems (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.77-3.98) than community clinic patients. The rates of postabortion health services utilization and risk of hospitalization were lower in community clinic abortion patients than in hospital day-surgery patients. However, it is not possible to fully control for important confounding variables when using these administrative data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11392176     DOI: 10.1177/106286060101600305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  6 in total

1.  Psychological aftermath of abortion.

Authors:  L L deVeber; Ian Gentles
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-10-29

3.  Postpartum mental health study flawed by fetal loss omission.

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Pregnancy associated death in record linkage studies relative to delivery, termination of pregnancy, and natural losses: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David C Reardon; John M Thorp
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-11-13

5.  Barriers to rural induced abortion services in Canada: findings of the British Columbia Abortion Providers Survey (BCAPS).

Authors:  Wendy V Norman; Judith A Soon; Nanamma Maughn; Jennifer Dressler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Public Health Impact of Legal Termination of Pregnancy in the US: 40 Years Later.

Authors:  John M Thorp
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-12-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.