Literature DB >> 1139175

High blood pressure. detection and treatment by general practitioners.

C Hodes, P A Rogers, M G Everitt.   

Abstract

A questionnaire was sent to a 10% random sample of general practitioners in England and Wales on their attitudes to the detection and treatment of hypertension; 62% responded and no further inquiry was made. Their view on detection and criteria for treatment and investigations performed were considered in relation to their background. More of the older practitioners always measured blood pressure and 36% of all practitioners believed that hypertensive patients usually present with symptoms. Altogether 91% thought that strokes could be prevented by treating hypertension, and only 18% reported difficulty in keeping patients on treatment. Older practitioners preferred to measure the distolic pressure using phase five, while the younger preferred phase four. Nearly all doctors were satisfied with their current sphygmomanometers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1139175      PMCID: PMC1673564          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5972.674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  1 in total

1.  Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1970-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

  1 in total
  13 in total

1.  Physicians' attitudes to four common problems: hypertension, atrial fibrillation, transient ischaemic attacks, and angina pectoris.

Authors:  C A Bucknall; G K Morris; J R Mitchell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-20

2.  Divergent views of hospital staff on detecting and managing hypertension.

Authors:  L Taylor; M C Foster; D G Beevers
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-03-17

3.  Blood pressure measurement at screening and in general practice.

Authors:  D H Barlow; D G Beevers; V M Hawthorne; H D Watt; G A Young
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1977-01

4.  Persistence of divergent views of hospital staff in detecting and managing hypertension.

Authors:  S Manek; J Rutherford; S H Jackson; P Turner
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-11-24

5.  Hypertension in women: a separate case for treatment?

Authors:  A J Silman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-10-20

6.  The management of hypertension--a survey of opinions among general practitioners.

Authors:  M Fulton; R J Kellett; D W MacLean; D M Parkin; M P Ryan
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1979-10

7.  High blood pressure: public views and knowledge.

Authors:  M Obrien; C Hodes
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1979-04

8.  Blood pressure control in private practice: a case report.

Authors:  A L Engelland; M H Alderman; H B Powell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  A comparison of hospital and general practice blood pressure readings using a shared-care record card.

Authors:  V L Osbourne; D G Beevers
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1981-06

Review 10.  Mild hypertension: to treat or not to treat?

Authors:  J M Walker; D G Beevers
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.