Literature DB >> 11391364

Epidural anesthesia-analgesia shortens length of stay after laparoscopic segmental colectomy for benign pathology.

A J Senagore1, D Whalley, C P Delaney, N Mekhail, H J Duepree, V W Fazio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aggressive postoperative care plans after open colectomy may allow earlier discharge, especially in conjunction with preoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia-analgesia using a local anesthetic and narcotic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of thoracic epidural anesthesia-analgesia using bupivacaine and fentanyl citrate in reducing lengths of stay after laparoscopic colectomy (LAC).
METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients who underwent LAC and who received perioperative thoracic epidural anesthesia-analgesia (TEG) was compared with a standard group of patients (STD) undergoing LAC during the 2 months preceding the implementation of the epidural management protocol. Patients with TEG received 6 to 8 mL bupivacaine (0.25%) and fentanyl citrate (100 microg) through a T8-9 or a T9-10 epidural catheter before the incision was made and a postoperative infusion of bupivacaine (0.1%) and fentanyl citrate (5 microg/mL) at 4 to 6 mL/h for 18 hours. STD patients had supplemental intravenous morphine. The postoperative care plan was otherwise identical between the 2 groups. Patients were matched by sex, age, and type of segmental resection. Discharge criteria included tolerance of 3 general diet meals, passage of flatus or stool, and adequate oral analgesia. Length of stay was defined as the time from admission for the surgical procedure to discharge from the hospital. Statistical analysis included a Student t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi-square trend test, and Fisher exact test where appropriate. Data are presented as mean +/- SEM.
RESULTS: Procedures performed were: right hemicolectomy-ileocolectomy (TEG, n = 5; STD, n = 5); or sigmoid colectomy-rectopexy (TEG, n = 17; STD, n = 17). There was no significant difference with respect to operating room (OR) time (TEG, 102 +/- 12 minutes; STD, 87 +/- 17 minutes), body mass index (TEG, 26 +/- 2; STD, 26 +/- 2), or American Society of Anesthesiologists class (I-III) distribution (TEG, 3/12/10; STD, 4/11/7), or mean incision length (TEG, 3.5 +/- 0.4 cm; STD, 3.7 +/- 0.3 cm.) No postoperative complications or readmissions occurred in either group. The length of stay decreased in the TEG group (TEG, 2.8 +/- 0.2 days; STD, 3.9 +/- 0.3; P <.001) and the median length of stay for the 2 groups was similarly less (TEG, 2 days; STD, 3 days).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that thoracic epidural anesthesia-analgesia has a significant and favorable impact on dietary tolerance and length of stay after LAC. A thoracic epidural appears to be an important component of a postoperative care protocol, which adds further advantage to LAC without the need for labor-intensive and costly patient care plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11391364     DOI: 10.1067/msy.2001.114648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  18 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative ileus: progress towards effective management.

Authors:  Kathrine Holte; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Gastrointestinal transit after laparoscopic versus open colonic resection.

Authors:  L Basse; J L Madsen; P Billesbølle; L Bardram; H Kehlet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [Intraoperative coronary artery spasm with cardiac arrest: cardiologic acute intervention].

Authors:  W Fiderer; W Grosse; J Biscoping
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  ["Does minimally invasive surgery really imply minimally invasive anaesthesia?"].

Authors:  T Koch; R J Litz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target?

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Simone Beretta; Margherita Luperto; Davide Bernasconi; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Regional anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  George Vretzakis; Metaxia Bareka; Diamanto Aretha; Menelaos Karanikolas
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A nationwide analysis of the use and outcomes of epidural analgesia in open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Wissam J Halabi; Mehraneh D Jafari; Vinh Q Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Comparison of pain management after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with and without epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Yoshitomo Yanagimoto; Shuji Takiguchi; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Jota Mikami; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative pain relief and ileus after laparoscopic colorectal resection : Benefit with epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Urs Zingg; Danilo Miskovic; Christian T Hamel; Lukas Erni; Daniel Oertli; Urs Metzger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.