Literature DB >> 1139120

Urinary diversion: the physiological rationale for non-refluxing colonic conduits.

J P Richie, D G Skinner.   

Abstract

In order to make an accurate comparison between ileal and colonic conduits, and ileal conduit was created from one kidney and a non-refluxing colonic conduit from the other kidney in 16 adult mongrel dogs. Colonic loops do not reflux, have equal resting pressures and rate of emptying when contrasted with ileal conduits, and carry a lower incidence of stomal complications. Colonic conduits respond more favourably to acute occlusion and produce a significantly lower rate of pyelonephritis at 3 months. These factors suggest that colonic conduits offer a definite advantage for long-term urinary diversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1139120     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1975.tb03963.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  5 in total

1.  Urology: complications of urinary undiversion.

Authors:  J P Richie; S A Sacks
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1977-01

2.  Urology: urinary lysosomal enzymes for early detection of renal allograft rejection.

Authors:  R M Ehrlich; C Smeesters
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1977-01

3.  Urinary tract re-functionalization after long-term diversion. A 20-year experience with 177 patients.

Authors:  W H Hendren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Evaluation of ileum interposition in ureterosigmoidostomy: experimental studies.

Authors:  P H Petritsch; H Gnad; P Vilits; G Suppan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1983

5.  Urinary diversion.

Authors:  R Tscoll
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1978
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.