Literature DB >> 11390476

Factors affecting the efficiency of CD8+ T cell cross-priming with exogenous antigens.

H T Maecker1, S A Ghanekar, M A Suni, X S He, L J Picker, V C Maino.   

Abstract

Processing of exogenous protein Ags by APC leads predominantly to presentation of peptides on class II MHC and, thus, stimulation of CD4+ T cell responses. However, "cross-priming" can also occur, whereby peptides derived from exogenous Ags become displayed on class I MHC molecules and stimulate CD8+ T cell responses. We compared the efficiency of cross-priming with exogenous proteins to use of peptide Ags in human whole blood using a flow cytometry assay to detect T cell intracellular cytokine production. CD8+ T cell responses to whole CMV proteins were poorly detected (compared with peptide responses) in most CMV-seropositive donors. Such responses could be increased by using higher doses of Ag than were required to achieve maximal CD4+ T cell responses. A minority of donors displayed significantly more efficient CD8+ T cell responses to whole protein, even at low Ag doses. These responses were MHC class I-restricted and dependent upon proteosomal processing, indicating that they were indeed due to cross-priming. The ability to efficiently cross-prime was not a function of the number of dendritic cells in the donor's blood. Neither supplementation of freshly isolated dendritic cells nor use of cultured, Ag-pulsed dendritic cells could significantly boost CD8 responses to whole-protein Ags in poorly cross-priming donors. Interestingly, freshly isolated monocytes performed almost as well as dendritic cells in inducing CD8 responses via cross-priming. In conclusion, the efficiency of cross-priming appears to be poor in most donors and is dependent upon properties of the individual's APC and/or T cell repertoire. It remains unknown whether cross-priming ability translates into any clinical advantage in ability to induce CD8+ T cell responses to foreign Ags.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11390476     DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  26 in total

1.  CMV antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell IFNgamma expression and proliferation responses in healthy CMV-seropositive individuals.

Authors:  Elizabeth Sinclair; Douglas Black; C Lorrie Epling; Alexander Carvidi; Steven Z Josefowicz; Barry M Bredt; Mark A Jacobson
Journal:  Viral Immunol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.257

2.  Cytomegalovirus-Responsive CD8+ T Cells Expand After Solid Organ Transplantation in the Absence of CMV Disease.

Authors:  L E Higdon; J Trofe-Clark; S Liu; K B Margulies; M K Sahoo; E Blumberg; B A Pinsky; J S Maltzman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Measurement of cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity of human cytomegalovirus seropositive individuals by a highly sensitive coupled luminescent method.

Authors:  Henry Ogbomo; Janina Geiler; Anke Leutz; Kristina von Kietzell; Martin Michaelis; Hans Wilhelm Doerr; Jindrich Cinatl
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Interaction of rotavirus with human myeloid dendritic cells.

Authors:  Carlos F Narváez; Juana Angel; Manuel A Franco
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Polyfunctional analysis of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific CD4(+) and CD8 (+) memory T-cells in HCMV-seropositive healthy subjects following different stimuli.

Authors:  Elisa Gabanti; Francesca Bruno; Chiara Fornara; Stefano Bernuzzi; Daniele Lilleri; Giuseppe Gerna
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 8.317

6.  Robust immune response elicited by a novel and unique Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein using an optimized DNA/protein heterologous prime/boost protocol.

Authors:  Mark J Cayabyab; Suely S Kashino; Antonio Campos-Neto
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  Multiparameter intracellular cytokine staining.

Authors:  Patricia Lovelace; Holden T Maecker
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

8.  Comparison of the Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot and CMV QuantiFERON Cell-Mediated Immune Assays in CMV-Seropositive and -Seronegative Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women.

Authors:  Alda Saldan; Gabriella Forner; Carlo Mengoli; Daniel Tinto; Loredana Fallico; Marta Peracchi; Nadia Gussetti; Giorgio Palù; Davide Abate
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) capsid-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes eliminate only vector-transduced cells coexpressing the AAV2 capsid in vivo.

Authors:  Chengwen Li; Matthew Hirsch; Aravind Asokan; Brian Zeithaml; Hong Ma; Tal Kafri; R Jude Samulski
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) gag antigen-specific T-helper and granule-dependent CD8 T-cell activities in exposed but uninfected heterosexual partners of HIV type 1-infected individuals in North India.

Authors:  Suresh Pallikkuth; Ajay Wanchu; Archana Bhatnagar; Ravinder Kaur Sachdeva; Meera Sharma
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.