| Literature DB >> 11390113 |
S Van Bost1, S Roels, J Mainil.
Abstract
There exists experimental evidence that necrotoxigenic Escherichia coli (NTEC) strains producing the cytotoxic necrotising factor 1 cause intestinal and extra-intestinal disease in piglets. On the other hand, no experimental model has been developed with NTEC strains producing the cytotoxic necrotising factor 2. In all, 14 colostrum-restricted calves were orally challenged with two strains isolated from the faeces of a diarrheic calf (B20a) or from the heart blood of a septicaemic calf (1404). All calves had diarrhoea which lasted until euthanasia in eight of them. In those calves, diarrhoea was correlated with the faecal excretion of the challenge strains. At necropsy, vascular congestion of the intestinal mucosa, hypertrophy of the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and some congestion of the lungs were observed. Bacteriology confirmed the colonisation of the intestine by the challenge strains which were also recovered from the heart blood, the lungs and/or the liver. Histological sections confirmed enterocolitis, lymphadenitis and limited bronchopneumonia. In the intestinal tissue sections, bacteria testing positive in an in situ DNA hybridisation assay with a CNF2 probe were observed. Those results were confirmed by immunohistochemistry with a polyclonal anti-O78 and a monoclonal anti-F17b antisera. Three of the five control calves receiving either saline or a CNF(-), F17a strain (25KH09) had no clinical signs or lesions. The other two presented a profuse liquid diarrhoea but those calves were positive for the presence of K99(+) E. coli. In this model, both NTEC2 strains were thus, able to colonise the intestine, to cause long-lasting diarrhoea and to invade the blood stream with localisation in various internal organs in colostrum-restricted conventional newborn calves.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2001 PMID: 11390113 PMCID: PMC7117233 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(01)00360-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Microbiol ISSN: 0378-1135 Impact factor: 3.293
Correlation between the presence of the diarrhoea and the challenge strain in the faecesa
| Calves | Challenge strain | Inoculation time | Euthanasia (hPi) | Diarrhoea | Challenge strain in the faeces | ||
| Appearance (hPi) | Persistence until | Appearance | Persistence until | ||||
| 1 | 1404 | 24 | 64 | 11 | E | 20 hPi | 36 hPi |
| 2 | 1404 | 24 | 60 | 18 | 26 hPi | 18 hPi | 30 hPi |
| 3 | 1404 | 24 | 73 | 14 | 24 hPi | 16 hPi | 24 hPi |
| 12 | 1404 | 06 | 51 | 28 | 36 hPi | 24 hPi | 28 hPi |
| 13 | 1404 | 06 | 50 | 28 | E | 36 hPi | E |
| 14 | 1404 | 06 | 48 | 28 | E | 24 hPi | E |
| 27 | 1404 | 06 | 46 | 40 | E | 28 hPi | E |
| 5 | B20a | 06 | 65 | 36 | 48 hPi | 36 hPi | 48 hPi |
| 6 | B20a | 06 | 86 | 24 | 46 hPi | 24 hPi | 28 hPi |
| 7 | B20a | 06 | 36 | 28 | E | 24 hPi | E |
| 8 | B20a | 06 | 74 | 28 | E | 28 hPi | E |
| 9 | B20a | 06 | 39 | 28 | E | 24 hPi | E |
| 10 | B20a | 06 | 45 | 40 | E | 28 hPi | E |
| 11 | B20a | 06 | 57 | 32 | E | 32 hPi | E |
| c1 | − | NR | − | − | − | NR | NR |
| c2 | − | NR | 45 | − | − | NR | NR |
| c3 | 25KH09 | 06 | 60 | − | − | 12 hPi | E |
| c4 | − | NR | 48 | 24 | E | NR | NR |
| c5 | − | NR | 52 | 20 | E | NR | NR |
Hours post-inoculation: hPi; euthanasia: E; not relevant: NR; none or negative: −.
Excretion of K99+E. coli.
Faecal excretion of the 1404 strain in log cfu’s ml−1 of faecesa
| Time (hPi) | C1 | C2 | C3 | C12 | C13 | C14 | C27 |
| 0–16 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
| 16 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
| 20 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | |||
| 24 | 10.9 | N.D. | 7.3 | N.D. | |||
| 28 | N.D. | 8.5 | |||||
| 32 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 8.9 | ||
| 36 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 9.0 | |||
| 40 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | |||
| 44 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | |||
The calf was dead at the period 46–73hPi; the challenge strain was not detected: N.D.; values in bold type show presence of diarrhoea.
Faecal excretion of the B20a strain in log cfu’s ml−1 of faecesa
| Time (hPi) | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 |
| 0–24 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
| 24 | N.D. | 7 | N.D. | 10.4 | N.D. | N.D. | |
| 28 | N.D. | 9.4 | N.D. | ||||
| 32 | N.D. | N.D. | 9.7 | ||||
| 36 | N.D. | 9.1 | |||||
| 40 | N.D. | ||||||
| 44 | N.D. | ||||||
| 48 | N.D. | ||||||
| 56 | N.D. | N.D. | |||||
| 60 | N.D. | N.D. | |||||
| 64 | N.D. | N.D. | |||||
| 68 | N.D. | ||||||
| 72–86 | |||||||
The challenge strain was not detected: N.D.; values in bold type show presence of diarrhoea.
Calf was dead at that time.
Fig. 1(A) Ileum of C13 (HE 128×): enteritis, presence of congestion (c) and neutrophils (n). (B) Ileum of the control calf C2: no abnormalities but congestion were detected. (C) Lung of C13 (HE 128×): pneumonia, presence of congestion (c), neutrophils (n) and lymphocytes (l). (D) Jejunum of the C7 (HE 240×): bacteria associated with the intestinal villi (arrow).
Recovery of the challenge strain from the intestinal content at necropsya in log cfu’s ml−1 of faecesb
| Calves | Duodenum | Jejunum | Ileum | Caecum | Colon |
| 1 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 2 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 3 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 12 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 13 | 6.8 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 7.7 |
| 14 | 7 | 8 | 8.1 | 8.6 | 8.1 |
| 27 | 7.2 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 8.6 | 8.7 |
| 5 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 6 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 7 | 6.7 | 7.4 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 8 |
| 8 | 6.6 | 7.8 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 7.6 |
| 9 | 6.5 | 8.5 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 7.9 |
| 10 | 6.8 | 8.2 | 8.5 | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| 11 | 6 | 8 | 8.6 | 8.2 | 8 |
| c3 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 10.5 |
| c4 | 9.3 | 9.9 | 10.8 | 10.1 | 9.8 |
| c5 | 9.5 | 10.3 | 10.5 | 10.1 | 9.9 |
The time of the euthanasia is mentioned in Table 1.
Absence of NTEC2 strain in the whole culture: −.
Recovery of the contaminating K99+E. coli in logcfu’s.
Recovery of the challenge strain from the extra-intestinal organs at necropsya
| Calves | Blood | Lung | Liver |
| 1 | − | − | − |
| 2 | − | − | − |
| 3 | − | − | − |
| 12 | − | − | − |
| 13 | + | + | + |
| 14 | + | + | + |
| 27 | − | − | + |
| 5 | − | − | − |
| 6 | − | − | − |
| 7 | + | + | − |
| 8 | + | + | − |
| 9 | − | + | − |
| 10 | + | + | + |
| 11 | + | − | − |
| c3 | − | − | − |
| c4 | − | − | − |
| c5 | − | − | − |
Presence of NTEC2 strains: +; absence of NTEC2 strains: −.
Recovery of the contaminating K99+E. coli.
Fig. 2Detection of CNF2+ bacteria on ileum sections by in situ hybridisation (staining, DAB; counterstaining, hematoxylin, 240×): positive bacteria are localised at the top and inside the enterocytes (arrow); L, intestinal lumen; E, enterocyte.