Literature DB >> 11389991

Regulatory perspectives on in vitro (dissolution)/in vivo (bioavailability) correlations.

V R Uppoor1.   

Abstract

In vitro dissolution has been extensively used as a quality control tool for solid oral dosage forms. In several cases, however, it is not known whether one can predict the in vivo performance of these products from in vitro dissolution data. In an effort to minimize unnecessary human testing, investigations of in vitro/in vivo correlations (IVIVC) between in vitro dissolution and in vivo bioavailability are increasingly becoming an integral part of extended release (ER) drug product development. This increased activity in developing IVIVCs indicates the value of IVIVCs to the pharmaceutical industry. Because of the scientific interest and the associated utility of IVIVC as a valuable tool, the US Food and Drug Administration has published a Guidance in September 1997, entitled Extended Release Oral Dosage Forms: Development, Evaluation and Application of In Vitro/In Vivo Correlations. A predictive IVIVC enables in vitro dissolution to serve as a surrogate for in vivo bioequivalence testing. IVIVCs can be used in place of biostudies that may otherwise be required to demonstrate bioequivalence, when certain preapproval and postapproval changes are made in formulation, equipment, manufacturing process or in the manufacturing site. IVIVC development could lead to improved product quality (more meaningful dissolution specifications) and decreased regulatory burden (reduced biostudy requirements). This article will discuss in detail the FDA Guidance which deals with the development, evaluation methods and criteria, and applications of IVIVCs. From a regulatory point of view, the applications of IVIVC to grant biowaivers and to set dissolution specifications for ER oral dosage forms will be presented. Additionally, since the principles of IVIVC are considered to be similar for non-oral dosage forms, the guidance for oral extended release products may be applied for non-oral products as well. While the principles are likely to be the same, it is an interesting challenge to look at appropriate methods for dissolution testing and for development of in vitro/in vivo correlations for products such as injectable depot formulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11389991     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00268-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  25 in total

1.  Improving of the accuracy of in vitro-in vivo linear correlation using kinetic models for ultra sustained release theophylline tablets.

Authors:  E Karasulu; S Aktogu; H Y Karasulu; A Aydogdu; I Tuglular; G Ertan
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 2.  Challenges and opportunities in achieving bioequivalence for fixed-dose combination products.

Authors:  Amitava Mitra; Yunhui Wu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  In vitro-in vivo correlation for complex non-oral drug products: Where do we stand?

Authors:  Jie Shen; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Population in vitro-in vivo correlation model for pramipexole slow-release oral formulations.

Authors:  Elena Soto; Sebastian Haertter; Michael Koenen-Bergmann; Alexander Staab; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Applications of In Vitro-In Vivo Correlations in Generic Drug Development: Case Studies.

Authors:  Paramjeet Kaur; Xiaojian Jiang; John Duan; Ethan Stier
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  The differences between the branded and generic medicines using solid dosage forms: In-vitro dissolution testing.

Authors:  Mubarak Nasser Al Ameri; Nanda Nayuni; K G Anil Kumar; David Perrett; Arthur Tucker; Atholl Johnston
Journal:  Results Pharma Sci       Date:  2011-12-07

7.  A short term quality control tool for biodegradable microspheres.

Authors:  Susan D'Souza; Jabar A Faraj; Rossella Dorati; Patrick P DeLuca
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  In Vitro-In Vivo Relationship of Amorphous Insoluble API (Progesterone) in PLGA Microspheres.

Authors:  Chenguang Pu; Qiao Wang; Hongjuan Zhang; Jingxin Gou; Yuting Guo; Xinyi Tan; Bin Xie; Na Yin; Haibing He; Yu Zhang; Yanjiao Wang; Tian Yin; Xing Tang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Role of In Vitro Release Methods in Liposomal Formulation Development: Challenges and Regulatory Perspective.

Authors:  Deepak Solomon; Nilesh Gupta; Nihal S Mulla; Snehal Shukla; Yadir A Guerrero; Vivek Gupta
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Oral delivery of capsaicin using MPEG-PCL nanoparticles.

Authors:  Wei Peng; Xin-yi Jiang; Yuan Zhu; E Omari-Siaw; Wen-wen Deng; Jiang-nan Yu; Xi-ming Xu; Wei-ming Zhang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 6.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.