Literature DB >> 11389594

Mechanistic implications of methylglyoxal synthase complexed with phosphoglycolohydroxamic acid as observed by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy.

G T Marks1, T K Harris, M A Massiah, A S Mildvan, D H Harrison.   

Abstract

Methylglyoxal synthase (MGS) and triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) share neither sequence nor structural similarities, yet the reactions catalyzed by both enzymes are similar, in that both initially convert dihydroxyacetone phosphate to a cis-enediolic intermediate. This enediolic intermediate is formed from the abstraction of the pro-S C3 proton of DHAP by Asp-71 of MGS or the pro-R C3 proton of DHAP by Glu-165 of TIM. MGS then catalyzes the elimination of phosphate from this enediolic intermediate to form the enol of methylglyoxal, while TIM catalyzes proton donation to C2 to form D-glyceraldehyde phosphate. A competitive inhibitor of TIM, phosphoglycolohydroxamic acid (PGH) is found to be a tight binding competitive inhibitor of MGS with a K(i) of 39 nM. PGH's high affinity for MGS may be due in part to a short, strong hydrogen bond (SSHB) from the NOH of PGH to the carboxylate of Asp-71. Evidence for this SSHB is found in X-ray, 1H NMR, and fractionation factor data. The X-ray structure of the MGS homohexamer complexed with PGH at 2.0 A resolution shows this distance to be 2.30-2.37 +/- 0.24 A. 1H NMR shows a PGH-dependent 18.1 ppm signal that is consistent with a hydrogen bond length of 2.49 +/- 0.02 A. The D/H fractionation factor (phi = 0.43 +/- 0.02) is consistent with a hydrogen bond length of 2.53 +/- 0.01 A. Further, 15N NMR suggests a significant partial positive charge on the nitrogen atom of bound PGH, which could strengthen hydrogen bond donation to Asp-71. Both His-98 and His-19 are uncharged in the MGS-PGH complex on the basis of the chemical shifts of their Cdelta and C(epsilon) protons. The crystal structure reveals that Asp-71, on the re face of PGH, and His-19, on the si face of PGH, both approach the NO group of the analogue, while His-98, in the plane of PGH, approaches the carbonyl oxygen of the analogue. The phosphate group of PGH accepts nine hydrogen bonds from seven residues and is tilted out of the imidate plane of PGH toward the re face. Asp-71 and phosphate are thus positioned to function as the base and leaving group, respectively, in a concerted suprafacial 1,4-elimination of phosphate from the enediolic intermediate in the second step of the MGS reaction. Combined, these data suggest that Asp-71 is the one base that initially abstracts the C3 pro-S proton from DHAP and subsequently the 3-OH proton from the enediolic intermediate. This mechanism is compared to an alternative TIM-like mechanism for MGS, and the relative merits of both mechanisms are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11389594     DOI: 10.1021/bi0028237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  6 in total

1.  Optimal alignment for enzymatic proton transfer: structure of the Michaelis complex of triosephosphate isomerase at 1.2-A resolution.

Authors:  Gerwald Jogl; Sharon Rozovsky; Ann E McDermott; Liang Tong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Crystal Structures of the Iron-Sulfur Cluster-Dependent Quinolinate Synthase in Complex with Dihydroxyacetone Phosphate, Iminoaspartate Analogues, and Quinolinate.

Authors:  Michael K Fenwick; Steven E Ealick
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Structural basis for the regulatory interaction of the methylglyoxal synthase MgsA with the carbon flux regulator Crh in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Achim Dickmanns; Christopher P Zschiedrich; Johannes Arens; Iwan Parfentev; Jan Gundlach; Romina Hofele; Piotr Neumann; Henning Urlaub; Boris Görke; Ralf Ficner; Jörg Stülke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Automated protein motif generation in the structure-based protein function prediction tool ProMOL.

Authors:  Mikhail Osipovitch; Mitchell Lambrecht; Cameron Baker; Shariq Madha; Jeffrey L Mills; Paul A Craig; Herbert J Bernstein
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2015-11-16

5.  Selective prediction of interaction sites in protein structures with THEMATICS.

Authors:  Ying Wei; Jaeju Ko; Leonel F Murga; Mary Jo Ondrechen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Rationalization of allosteric pathway in Thermus sp. GH5 methylglyoxal synthase.

Authors:  Shekufeh Zareian; Khosro Khajeh; Mohammad Pazhang; Bijan Ranjbar
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.778

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.