Literature DB >> 11389416

Contemporary management of aortic branch compromise resulting from acute aortic dissection.

S R Lauterbach1, R P Cambria, D C Brewster, J P Gertler, G M Lamuraglia, E M Isselbacher, A D Hilgenberg, A C Moncure.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In an earlier report, we documented the incidence and impact of aortic branch compromise complicating acute aortic dissection (AD) over a 21-year interval (1965-1986). In the current study, management of peripheral vascular complications (PVCs) of AD over the past decade was reviewed.
METHODS: Medical records of patients treated for AD over the interval January 1, 1990, to December 31, 1999, were reviewed. Patients with branch compromise confirmed with radiography or operation and patients with spinal cord ischemia that was based on results of a physical examination defined the study group. Comparisons between subgroups with and without PVC over a 30-year interval were analyzed with the chi(2) test.
RESULTS: A total of 187 patients (101 proximal and 86 distal) were treated for AD over the study interval. A total of 53 (28%) of these patients had clinical evidence of organ or limb malperfusion (7 cerebral, 3 upper extremity, 5 spinal cord, 11 mesenteric, 12 renal, and 24 lower extremity [sites inclusive]), and one of three (17 patients) of these underwent specific peripheral vascular intervention. The remaining 65% (36) of the PVC group had complete or partial malperfusion resolution after central aortic therapy (medical or surgical) alone. Open techniques for treating PVC included aortic fenestration (9), femorofemoral grafting (2), and aortofemoral grafting (1). All had favorable outcomes with no mortality. Endovascular procedures in five patients included abdominal aortic fenestration (3) or stenting of the renal (2), mesenteric (2), and iliac (1) arteries with clinical success in three patients and two deaths. The in-hospital mortality rate for the entire group of 187 patients was 18% (15% for proximal aortic operation, 8% in medically treated patients). The presence of aortic branch compromise was not a statistically significant predictor of the patient mortality rate (23% with and 16% without; P =.26). Overall mortality rate in the current study (18% vs 37%; P =.000006) and the mortality rate with PVC (23% vs 51%; P =.001), in particular with mesenteric ischemia (36% vs 87%; P =.026), decreased significantly when compared with prior experience.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall mortality rate from AD during the past decade has decreased significantly. Similar trends were noted in patients with PVCs, a previously identified high-risk subgroup. Increased awareness and prompt, specific management of PVCs, in particular when visceral ischemia is present, have contributed to improved outcomes in patients with AD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11389416     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2001.115377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  24 in total

Review 1.  An update on surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: aortic root repair, endovascular stent graft, and genetic research.

Authors:  Shinichi Suzuki; Munetaka Masuda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Influence of operative strategy for the aortic arch in DeBakey type I aortic dissection - analysis of the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection type A (GERAADA).

Authors:  Jerry Easo; Ernst Weigang; Philipp P F Hölzl; Michael Horst; Isabell Hoffmann; Maria Blettner; Otto E Dapunt
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-03

Review 3.  The use of surgical glue in acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Shinichi Suzuki; Munetaka Masuda; Kiyotaka Imoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-21

4.  Renovascular hypertension: endovascular therapy in complicated aortic Stanford type B dissection.

Authors:  Janosch Cupa; Hans-Jörg Hippe; Philipp Schäfer; Norbert Frey; Christoph Langer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

5.  Two different cases of postoperative symptomatic common carotid artery involvment in type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Raoul A Droeser; Thomas Wolff; Edin Mujagic; Lorenz Gürke
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-11-27

Review 6.  Clinical dilemma in the surgical treatment of organ malperfusion caused by acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Takeshi Shimamoto; Tatsuhiko Komiya
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-04-26

7.  Endovascular Fenestration/Stenting First Followed by Delayed Open Aortic Repair for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection With Malperfusion Syndrome.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Carlo Maria Rosati; Elizabeth L Norton; Karen M Kim; Minhaj S Khaja; Narasimham Dasika; Xiaoting Wu; Whitney E Hornsby; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb; David M Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Stenting for acute aortic dissection with malperfusion as "bridge therapy".

Authors:  Wakako Fujita; Satoshi Taniguchi; Kazuyuki Daitoku; Ikuo Fukuda
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

Review 9.  [Malperfusion in aortic dissection: diagnostic problems and therapeutic procedures].

Authors:  R A Jánosi; D Böse; T Konorza; H Eggebrecht; K Tsagakis; H Jakob; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Placement of Endovascular Stent Graft in Acute Malperfusion Syndrome After Acute Type II Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Shin-Ah Son; Young-Ok Lee; Gun Jik Kim; Joon-Yong Cho; Jong-Tae Lee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.