Literature DB >> 11389368

Distraction extension injuries of the cervical spine.

A R Vaccaro1, G R Klein, J B Thaller, S A Rushton, J M Cotler, T J Albert.   

Abstract

Twenty-four consecutive patients with cervical distraction extension injuries were retrospectively reviewed to study the safety and efficacy of various treatment protocols in this type of cervical spine injury. Sixteen of 24 patients with cervical distraction extension injuries underwent surgical stabilization. All patients undergoing surgical stabilization were noted to have a stable fusion at their latest follow-up. There were three instances of surgically related neurologic deterioration as a result of over-distraction of the anterior column interspace at the time of graft placement. The overall mortality rate was 42% in this aged patient population. Anterior reconstruction of the cervical spine with an anterior cervical graft and plate acting as a tension band is the ideal treatment method for stabilization of acute distraction extension injuries involving primarily the soft tissue structures (anterior longitudinal ligament and intervertebral disc). Type 2 injuries, depending on the degree of displacement and the adequacy of closed reduction, may need to be approached initially posteriorly to obtain adequate alignment, followed by an anterior reconstructive procedure. Great care should be taken during anterior graft placement to avoid over-distraction of the spine. If nonsurgical intervention is selected, close regular radiographic follow-up is necessary to detect early vertebral malalignment, which may predispose to spinal cord dysfunction. Older patients sustaining this injury have a high mortality rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11389368     DOI: 10.1097/00002517-200106000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  5 in total

1.  Limitation of previous Allen classification and subaxial cervical spine injury classification (SLIC) system in distractive-extension injury of cervical spine: proposal of modified classification system.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Su-Kyung Lee; Dong-Hun Ham; Yong-Jin Kim; Byung-Wan Choi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Relationship between magnetic resonance imaging findings and spinal cord injury in extension injury of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Jong Hyun Ko; Byung-Wan Choi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-12-22

3.  Cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  Joel A Torretti; Dilip K Sengupta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 4.  What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications.

Authors:  Joost J van Middendorp; Laurent Audigé; Beate Hanson; Jens R Chapman; Allard J F Hosman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Management of Sub-axial Cervical Spine Injuries.

Authors:  Gautam Zaveri; Gurdip Das
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.