Literature DB >> 11389298

Risk factors for improper vaccine storage and handling in private provider offices.

K N Bell1, C J Hogue, C Manning, A P Kendal.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Preventing loss of vaccine potency during storage and handling is increasingly important as new, more expensive vaccines are introduced, in at least 1 case requiring a different approach to storage. Little information is available about the extent to which staff in private physicians' offices meet quality assurance needs for vaccines or have the necessary equipment. Although the National Immunization Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 1997 developed a draft manual to promote reliable vaccine storage and to supplement published information already available from the CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics, the best ways to improve vaccine storage and handling have not been defined.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the statewide prevalence of offices with suboptimal storage and handling, to identify the risk factors for suboptimal situations in the offices of private physicians, and to evaluate whether the distribution of a new National Immunization Program draft manual improved storage and handling practices.
DESIGN: Population-based survey, including site visits to a stratified, random sample of consenting private physicians' offices. At least 2 months before the site visits, nearly half (intervention group) of the offices were randomly selected to receive a draft CDC manual entitled, "Guideline for Vaccine Storage and Handling." The remainder was considered the control group. Trained graduate students conducted site visits, all being blinded to whether offices were in the intervention or control groups. Each site visit included measurements of refrigerator and freezer temperatures with digital thermometers (Digi-thermo, Model 15-077-8B, Control Company, Friendswood, TX; specified accuracy +/- 1 degrees C). Their metal-tipped probes were left in the center shelf of cold storage compartments for at least 20 minutes to allow them to stabilize. The type of refrigerator/freezer unit, temperature-monitoring equipment, and records were noted, as were the locations of vaccines in refrigerator and freezer, and the presence of expired vaccines. Other information collected included the following: staff training, use of written guidelines, receipt of vaccine deliveries, management of problems, number of patients, type of office, type of medical specialty, and the professional educational level of the individual designated as vaccine coordinator. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twenty-one private physicians' offices known by the Georgia Immunization Program in 1997 to immunize children routinely with government-provided vaccines. OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimates (prevalence, 95% confidence interval [CI]) of immunization sites found to have a suboptimally stored vaccine at a single point in time, defined as: vaccine past expiration date, at a temperature of </=1 degrees C or >/=9 degrees C in a refrigerator or >/=-14 degrees C (recommended for varicella vaccine) in freezer, and odds ratios (ORs) for risk factors associated with outcomes. We performed chi(2) analysis and Student's t tests to compare the administrative characteristics and quality assurance practices of offices with optimal vaccine storage with those with suboptimal storage, and to compare the proportion of offices with suboptimal storage practices in the groups that did and did not receive the CDC manual.
RESULTS: Statewide estimates of offices with at least 1 type of suboptimal vaccine storage included: freezer temperatures measuring >/=-14 degrees C = 17% (95% CI: 10.98, 23.06); offices with refrigerator temperatures >/=9 degrees C = 4.5% (95% CI: 1.08, 7.86); offices with expired vaccines = 9% (95% CI: 4.51, 13.37); and offices with at least 1 documented storage problem, 44% (95% CI: 35.79, 51.23). Major risk factors associated with vaccine storage outside recommended temperature ranges were: lack of thermometer in freezer (OR: 7.15; 95% CI: 3.46, 14.60); use of freezer compartment in small cold storage units (OR: 5.46; 95% CI = 2.70, 10.99); lack of thermometer in refrigerator (OR: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.15,8.20); and failure to maintain temperature log of freezer (OR: 2.70; 95% CI: 1.40, 5.23). Offices that adhered to daily temperature monitoring for all vaccine cold storage compartments, compared with those that did not, were 2 to 3 times more likely to assign this task to staff with higher levels of training, have received a recent visit from the state immunization program, and be affiliated with a hospital or have Federally Qualified Health Center status. In addition, sites using >1 refrigerator/freezer for vaccine storage were more likely to have at least 1 cold storage compartment outside recommended temperature ranges. We found no significant differences in the data reported above between the intervention group (received copy of the draft manual) and the control group (did not receive copy of draft manual), even when controlling for the annual number of immunizations given or the type of office. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11389298     DOI: 10.1542/peds.107.6.e100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  17 in total

1.  Assessing cold chain status in a metro city of India: an intervention study.

Authors:  S Mallik; P K Mandal; C Chatterjee; P Ghosh; N Manna; D Chakrabarty; S N Bagchi; S Dasgupta
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Factors affecting vaccine handling and storage practices among immunization service providers in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.

Authors:  David M Dairo; Oyarebu E Osizimete
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Validation of the shake test for detecting freeze damage to adsorbed vaccines.

Authors:  Umit Kartoglu; Nejat Kenan Ozgüler; Lara J Wolfson; Wiesław Kurzatkowski
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Evaluation of non-continuous temperature monitoring practices for vaccine storage units: A Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Andrew J Leidner; Carla E Lee; Ashley Tippins; Mark L Messonnier; John M Stevenson
Journal:  J Public Health (Bangkok)       Date:  2020-03-22

5.  Administration of hepatitis B vaccine in winter as a significant predictor of the poor effectiveness of vaccination in rural Mongolia: evidence from a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Dambadarjaa Davaalkham; Toshiyuki Ojima; Steven Wiersma; Tserenkhuu Lkhagvasuren; Pagvajav Nymadawa; Ritei Uehara; Makoto Watanabe; Izumi Oki; Yosikazu Nakamura
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Evaluation of the availability of cold chain tools and an assessment of health workers practice in dammam.

Authors:  Kholood M Mugharbel; Safa M Al Wakeel
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2009-09

7.  Effectiveness of a web-based education program to improve vaccine storage conditions in primary care (Keep Cool): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anika Thielmann; Anja Viehmann; Birgitta M Weltermann
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Vaccination management and vaccination errors: a representative online-survey among primary care physicians.

Authors:  Birgitta M Weltermann; Marta Markic; Anika Thielmann; Stefan Gesenhues; Martin Hermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Program on immunization and cold chain monitoring: the status in eight health districts in Cameroon.

Authors:  Jérôme Ateudjieu; Bruno Kenfack; Blaise Wakam Nkontchou; Maurice Demanou
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-03-16

Review 10.  Tools and approaches to ensure quality of vaccines throughout the cold chain.

Authors:  Umit Kartoglu; Julie Milstien
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.