M Blaivas1, J C Fox. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA. blaivas@pyro.net
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Patients presenting in cardiac arrest frequently have poor outcomes despite heroic resuscitative measures in the field. Many emergency medical systems have protocols in place to stop resuscitative measures in the field; however, further predictors need to be developed for cardiac arrest patients brought to the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVE: To examine the predictive value of cardiac standstill visualized on bedside ED echocardiograms during the initial presentations of patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: The study took place in a large urban community hospital with an emergency medicine residency program and a high volume of cardiac arrest patients. As part of routine care, all patients arriving with CPR in progress were subject to immediate and brief subxiphoid or parasternal cardiac ultrasound examination. This was followed by brief repeat ultrasound examination during the resuscitation when pulses were checked. A 2.5-MHz phased-array probe was used for imaging. Investigators filled out standardized data sheets. Examinations were taped for review. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. One hundred thirty-six patients had cardiac standstill on the initial echocardiogram. Of these, 71 patients had an identifiable rhythm on monitor. No patient with sonographically identified cardiac standstill survived to leave the ED regardless of his or her initial electrical rhythm. Cardiac standstill on echocardiogram resulted in a positive predictive value of 100% for death in the ED, with a negative predictive value of 58%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with cardiac standstill on bedside echocardiogram do not survive to leave the ED regardless of their electrical rhythms. This finding was uniform regardless of downtime. Although larger studies are needed, this may be an additional marker for cessation of resuscitative efforts.
UNLABELLED: Patients presenting in cardiac arrest frequently have poor outcomes despite heroic resuscitative measures in the field. Many emergency medical systems have protocols in place to stop resuscitative measures in the field; however, further predictors need to be developed for cardiac arrestpatients brought to the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVE: To examine the predictive value of cardiac standstill visualized on bedside ED echocardiograms during the initial presentations of patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: The study took place in a large urban community hospital with an emergency medicine residency program and a high volume of cardiac arrestpatients. As part of routine care, all patients arriving with CPR in progress were subject to immediate and brief subxiphoid or parasternal cardiac ultrasound examination. This was followed by brief repeat ultrasound examination during the resuscitation when pulses were checked. A 2.5-MHz phased-array probe was used for imaging. Investigators filled out standardized data sheets. Examinations were taped for review. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. One hundred thirty-six patients had cardiac standstill on the initial echocardiogram. Of these, 71 patients had an identifiable rhythm on monitor. No patient with sonographically identified cardiac standstill survived to leave the ED regardless of his or her initial electrical rhythm. Cardiac standstill on echocardiogram resulted in a positive predictive value of 100% for death in the ED, with a negative predictive value of 58%. CONCLUSIONS:Patients presenting with cardiac standstill on bedside echocardiogram do not survive to leave the ED regardless of their electrical rhythms. This finding was uniform regardless of downtime. Although larger studies are needed, this may be an additional marker for cessation of resuscitative efforts.
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jennifer R Marin; Alyssa M Abo; Alexander C Arroyo; Stephanie J Doniger; Jason W Fischer; Rachel Rempell; Brandi Gary; James F Holmes; David O Kessler; Samuel H F Lam; Marla C Levine; Jason A Levy; Alice Murray; Lorraine Ng; Vicki E Noble; Daniela Ramirez-Schrempp; David C Riley; Turandot Saul; Vaishali Shah; Adam B Sivitz; Ee Tein Tay; David Teng; Lindsey Chaudoin; James W Tsung; Rebecca L Vieira; Yaffa M Vitberg; Resa E Lewiss Journal: Crit Ultrasound J Date: 2016-11-03