Literature DB >> 11388202

Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: midterm investigational trial results.

D J Thomson1, W R Jamieson, J G Dumesnil, J J Burgess, C M Peniston, J Métras, J A Sullivan, J C Parrott, A Maitland, I J Cybulsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The midterm clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis was evaluated in a regulatory trial.
METHODS: In nine Canadian centers, 802 bioprostheses (560 aortic and 242 mitral) were implanted between September 1994 and April 1999 in patients with a mean age of 70 years.
RESULTS: Survival for aortic valve replacement at 4 years was 84.4%+/-3.1%. Freedom from valve-related or unexplained death was 95.6%+/-1.9%; structural valve deterioration, 100.0%; reoperation, 96.2%+/-1.7%; major thromboembolism, 96.1%+/-1.8%; and major antithrombotic-related hemorrhage, 96.4%+/-1.7%. Echocardiographic derived mean systolic gradient was 13.4 mm Hg at 4 years with an indexed effective orifice area of 0.7 to 0.8 cm2/m2. A significant decrease in left ventricular mass was shown over time in all valve sizes. Survival for mitral valve replacement at 4 years was 79.2%+/-6.8%. Freedom from valve-related or unexplained death was 96.5%+/-3.4%; structural valve deterioration, 100%; reoperation, 97.0%+/-3.2%; major thromboembolism, 95.7%+/-3.8%; and major antithrombotic-related hemorrhage, 95.0%+/-4.2%. Echocardiographically measured averaged mean diastolic gradient was 4.5 mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: The Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis is safe and effective in both the aortic and mitral positions. The valve has low gradients in both positions and excellent left ventricular mass regression in the patients with aortic valve replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11388202     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02551-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  The Mosaic Mitral Valve Bioprosthesis: A Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Follow-Up.

Authors:  Michele Celiento; Stefania Blasi; Andrea De Martino; Stefano Pratali; Aldo D Milano; Uberto Bortolotti
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2016-02-01

2.  Antithrombotic Strategies After Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Joel N Papak; Joseph C Chiovaro; North Noelck; Laura D Healy; Michele Freeman; Jacquelyn A Quin; Robin Paynter; Allison Low; Karli Kondo; Owen J T McCarty; Devan Kansagara
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Late results after mitral valve replacement with Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger.

Authors:  Giovanni A Chiariello; Anne-Sophie Beraud; Olivier Vahdat; Jérôme Van Rothem; Olivier Garcia; Philippe Soula; Pierre Berthoumieu; Issam Abouliatim
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

4.  Clinical outcomes and hemodynamic performance of Dafodil™ aortic and mitral pericardial bioprosthesis: 1-year results from Dafodil-1 first-in-human trial.

Authors:  C S Hiremath; Anil R Jain; Anurag Garg; Nirmal Gupta; Yugal K Mishra; Zile Singh Meharwal; Nityanand Thakur; Atul A Maslekar; Naman Shastri
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 1.637

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.