Literature DB >> 11388197

Experience with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly.

M Carrier1, M Pellerin, L P Perrault, Y Hébert, P Pagé, R Cartier, I Dyrda, L C Pelletier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Valve replacement in small aortic root remains a surgical challenge. The objective of this study was to compare results of the 19-mm bioprosthesis with those of larger prostheses in the elderly.
METHODS: The 443 patients, 70 years of age and older, who underwent aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprostheses were reviewed.
RESULTS: There were 93 patients with a mean age of 76+/-4 years with implantation of 19-mm prostheses and 350 patients with a mean age of 75+/-4 years with larger bioprostheses. Associated aortoplasty was performed in 10 patients (11%) with 19-mm bioprostheses and in 8 patients (2%) with larger bioprostheses (p = 0.001). There were 11 deaths (12%) within 30 days of surgery in patients with 19-mm prostheses and 22 deaths (6%) among those with larger prostheses (p = 0.1). The 7-year survival rate averaged 61%+/-7% in patients with 19-mm prostheses and 67%+/-4% in those with larger prostheses (p = 0.8). The 7-year freedom rates from all valve-related events averaged 96%+/-2% and 93%+/-2%, respectively (p = 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis offers excellent midterm results in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11388197     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02508-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in the elderly: influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on late survival and left ventricular mass regression.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kato; Yasushi Tsutsumi; Takahiro Kawai; Tomoyuki Goto; Yosuke Takahashi; Hirokazu Ohashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-08-13

2.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch may be irrelevant after aortic valve replacement with the 19-mm Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or older.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Kazuhiro Hashimoto; Hiroshi Okuyama; Tatsuumi Sasaki; Hiromitsu Takakura; Katsuhisa Onoguchi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Late clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves.

Authors:  Hyoung Woo Chang; Wook Sung Kim; Joong Hyun Ahn; Keumhee C Carriere; Dong Seop Jeong; Yang Hyun Cho; Kiick Sung; Pyo Won Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis in East China.

Authors:  Lei Guo; Junnan Zheng; Liangwei Chen; Renyuan Li; Liang Ma; Yiming Ni; Haige Zhao
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Long-Term Results (up to 20 Years) of 19 mm or Smaller Prostheses in the Aortic Position. Does Size Matter? A Propensity-Matched Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Horea Feier; Andrei Grigorescu; Lucian Falnita; Oana Rachita; Marian Gaspar; Constantin T Luca
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Early and mid-term outcome in terms of functional and hemodynamic performance of the st. Jude regent 19-mm aortic mechanical prosthesis versus 19-mm carpentier edwards aortic biological prosthesis.

Authors:  Edvin Prifti; Massimo Bonacchi; Fadil Ademaj; Gabriele Giunti; Giampiero Esposito; Arben Baboci; Gani Bajraktari; Altin Veshti; Aurel Demiraj; Vittorio Vanini
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Early evaluation of the aortic root after Nicks' procedure.

Authors:  Ujjwal Kumar Chowdhury; Sukhjeet Singh; Niwin George; Suruchi Hasija; Lakshmikumari Sankhyan; Niraj Nirmal Pandey; Sanjoy Sengupta; Mani Kalaivani
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-08-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.