Literature DB >> 11388104

Survey of cardiac pacing and implanted defibrillator practice patterns in the United States in 1997.

A D Bernstein1, V Parsonnet.   

Abstract

A survey of implanters of permanent cardiac pacemakers and ICDs in the United States during 1997 was conducted to identify present and changing patterns in indications for pacing, implantation techniques, pacing-mode selection, follow-up, and opinions regarding pacing and ICD related issues. This report is an update from 1993 of surveys performed every 4 years for the International Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology Society (ICPES). Questionnaires were sent to implanting physicians who were members of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE), and who might, therefore, be expected to be more conversant than others with the state of the art. Four major manufacturers also provided estimates of the numbers of pacemakers and ICDs implanted in the United States from 1994 through 1997. In 1997, approximately 182,000 new rhythm management devices, including 153,000 primary pacing systems and 29,000 ICDs, were implanted, an increase of 24% for pacemakers and 90% for ICDs since 1994. In 1997, pacemaker implantations were performed by about 8,600 physicians working in 3,300 hospitals and 1,000 independent "surgi-centers." From 1994 to 1997, sales in the United States of dual chamber pacemakers rose from 58% to 69% of the total, and adaptive rate systems from 74% to 90%. ICD sales increased by about 29% per year from 18,700 to 35,000 units. This study disclosed significant differences among implanter subcategories and between present and earlier practices, and it provided useful insights into trends in pacemaker and defibrillator practice. Future surveys would be facilitated if a standardized implant registry like that used in Europe were established in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11388104     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00842.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  17 in total

Review 1.  Creation of a biological pacemaker by gene- or cell-based approaches.

Authors:  Eduardo Marbán; Hee Cheol Cho
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Temporal trends in permanent pacemaker implantation: a population-based study.

Authors:  Daniel Z Uslan; Imad M Tleyjeh; Larry M Baddour; Paul A Friedman; Sarah M Jenkins; Jennifer L St Sauver; David L Hayes
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: postcode prescribing in the UK 1998-2002.

Authors:  A D Cunningham; C J Plummer; J M McComb; S W Lord; M W Cunningham; J-M Toussaint; A F Rickards
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  The frequency and incremental cost of major complications among medicare beneficiaries receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Matthew R Reynolds; David J Cohen; Aaron D Kugelmass; Phillip P Brown; Edmund R Becker; Steven D Culler; April W Simon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Pacing the Heart with Genes: Recent Progress in Biological Pacing.

Authors:  Hee Cheol Cho
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Current state of the art for cardiac arrhythmia gene therapy.

Authors:  J Kevin Donahue
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 12.310

7.  Remote interrogation and monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  George K Joseph; Bruce L Wilkoff; Thomas Dresing; John Burkhardt; Yaariv Khaykin
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Impact of the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial on clinical practice.

Authors:  Ivan C K Ho; Jonathan J Passeri; Mary L Guy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Patrick T Ellinor
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Pacemaker component allergy: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  David L Hayes; Kathy Loesl
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 10.  Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.

Authors:  J Dretzke; W D Toff; G Y H Lip; J Raftery; A Fry-Smith; R Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.