Literature DB >> 11387419

An audit of audits: are we completing the cycle?

J Gnanalingham1, M G Gnanalingham, K K Gnanalingham.   

Abstract

Clinical audit plays an important part in the drive to improve quality of patient care and thus forms a cornerstone of clinical governance. We evaluated the standard of clinical audits conducted by all departments in a teaching hospital between 1996 and 1997. Of a total of 213 audits carried out, 102 (48%) were 'partial' and only 29 (14%) were 'full'. Recommendations for improvement emerged from 134 (63%) of the audits performed. In only 51 audits (24%) was the cycle completed by re-auditing, during the subsequent 3 years. Most departments undertake clinical audits but failure to close the loop undermines their effectiveness and wastes resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11387419      PMCID: PMC1281525          DOI: 10.1177/014107680109400609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  4 in total

1.  Auditing audits: the method of Oxfordshire Medical Audit Advisory Group.

Authors:  J Derry; M Lawrence; K Griew; J Anderson; J Humphreys; K S Pandher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-16

2.  Completing the feedback loop.

Authors:  J Hollowell; P Littlejohns; Y Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-09-14

Review 3.  Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  M Mugford; P Banfield; M O'Hanlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-17

4.  Audit of the Medical Audit Committee.

Authors:  P S Parfrey; M Gillespie; P J McManamon; R Fisher
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Hearing half the message? A re-audit of the care of patients with acute asthma by emergency ambulance crews in London.

Authors:  H Snooks; M Halter; Y Palmer; H Booth; F Moore
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-12

2.  Auditing orthopaedic audit.

Authors:  E Guryel; K Acton; S Patel
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S M Campbell; M Hann; J Hacker; A Durie; A Thapar; M O Roland
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

Review 4.  Payment by results or payment by outcome? The history of measuring medicine.

Authors:  Rory J O'Connor; Vera C Neumann
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 18.000

5.  Audit of orthopaedic audits in an english teaching hospital: are we closing the loop?

Authors:  H J Iqbal; P Pidikiti
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-06-11

6.  Interface flow process audit: using the patient's career as a tracer of quality of care and of system organisation.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Unger; Bruno Marchal; Sylvie Dugas; Marie-Jeanne Wuidar; Daniel Burdet; Pierre Leemans; Jacques Unger
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  FOUNDATION DOCTORS' AUDITS: EFFECTIVE OR NOT?

Authors:  Paul Torpiano; Karen Sapiano; Pierre Ellul
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2018-01-31

8.  Plasma HbA1c in the investigation of suspected heart failure in general practice: An audit of the 2018 NICE guidelines update.

Authors:  Theodoros Paschalis; Carol Jones
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-02-28

9.  Quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study.

Authors:  Elizabeth McGeorge; Charles Coughlan; Martha Fawcett; Robert Edward Klaber
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.