R C Chan1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong, China. ckrchan@graduate.hku.hk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the base rate of symptoms similar to those of post-concussion symptoms (PCS) among a group of participants without head injury. The effect of subjective complaints upon cognitive functioning was also examined. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 85 participants without head injury, other identifiable neurological diseases or psychiatric diseases were recruited. OUTCOME MEASURES: These included Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Checklist, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, Colour Trails Test, Stroop Word-Colour Test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Symbol Digits Modality Test, Word Fluency Test, Design Fluency Test, Digits Forward and Backward Span Test, and Modified Six Elements Test. RESULTS: A relatively high proportion of the participants reported symptoms similar to those of patients with PCS. These included longer time to think (65.9%), forgetfulness (58.9%), poor concentration (58.9%), fatigue easily (53.5%), and sleep disturbances (50.6%). Gender effect was not significant for either the individual item or the total score of the Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Checklist. Moreover, there was no difference found between low symptom reporters and high symptom reporters in terms of attention, working memory, mental fluency, and strategy allocation. CONCLUSION: The base rates of symptoms were consistent with previous studies among the nonclinical groups. However, persons reporting a high score of concussion-like symptoms did not perform less well than those reporting a low score of symptoms in attention, working memory, mental fluency and strategy allocation.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the base rate of symptoms similar to those of post-concussion symptoms (PCS) among a group of participants without head injury. The effect of subjective complaints upon cognitive functioning was also examined. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 85 participants without head injury, other identifiable neurological diseases or psychiatric diseases were recruited. OUTCOME MEASURES: These included Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Checklist, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, Colour Trails Test, Stroop Word-Colour Test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Symbol Digits Modality Test, Word Fluency Test, Design Fluency Test, Digits Forward and Backward Span Test, and Modified Six Elements Test. RESULTS: A relatively high proportion of the participants reported symptoms similar to those of patients with PCS. These included longer time to think (65.9%), forgetfulness (58.9%), poor concentration (58.9%), fatigue easily (53.5%), and sleep disturbances (50.6%). Gender effect was not significant for either the individual item or the total score of the Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Checklist. Moreover, there was no difference found between low symptom reporters and high symptom reporters in terms of attention, working memory, mental fluency, and strategy allocation. CONCLUSION: The base rates of symptoms were consistent with previous studies among the nonclinical groups. However, persons reporting a high score of concussion-like symptoms did not perform less well than those reporting a low score of symptoms in attention, working memory, mental fluency and strategy allocation.
Authors: Michael W Kirkwood; Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Christopher Randolph; Michael McCrea; Vicki A Anderson Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2007-09-01 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Scott G Piland; Michael S Ferrara; Stephen N Macciocchi; Steven P Broglio; Trenton E Gould Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Lindsay D Nelson; Jana Ranson; Adam R Ferguson; Joseph Giacino; David O Okonkwo; Alex Valadka; Geoffrey Manley; Michael McCrea Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Paul E Rapp; Brenna M Rosenberg; David O Keyser; Dominic Nathan; Kevin M Toruno; Christopher J Cellucci; Alfonso M Albano; Scott A Wylie; Douglas Gibson; Adele M K Gilpin; Theodore R Bashore Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: S B Strauss; N Kim; C A Branch; M E Kahn; M Kim; R B Lipton; J M Provataris; H F Scholl; M E Zimmerman; M L Lipton Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Lindsay D Nelson; Robyn E Furger; Jana Ranson; Sergey Tarima; Thomas A Hammeke; Christopher Randolph; William B Barr; Kevin Guskiewicz; Christopher M Olsen; E Brooke Lerner; Michael A McCrea Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: S E Wall; W H Williams; S Cartwright-Hatton; T P Kelly; J Murray; M Murray; A Owen; M Turner Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 10.154