Literature DB >> 11385825

Memory for faces, shoes, and objects by deaf and hearing signers and hearing nonsigners.

P Arnold1, M Mills.   

Abstract

The visual spatial memory of 15 deaf signers, 15 hearing signers, and 15 hearing nonsigners for shoes, faces, and verbalizable objects was measured using the game Concentration. It was hypothesized that the deaf and hearing signers would require fewer attempts than the hearing nonsigners on the shoes and faces tasks because of their experience of using a visual-spatial language; and, in the case of the Deaf, also possibly, due to a compensatory mechanism. It was also hypothesized that memory for shoes would be more like that for faces than for simple objects. It was also anticipated that there would be no difference between the three group's memories for verbalizable objects. Deaf signers were found to be similar to hearing signers, both of whom were better than hearing nonsigners on the faces and shoes tasks. Generally, performance on the faces and shoes tasks was similar and followed the same pattern for the three groups. The three groups performed at a similar level on the objects task. There were no gender differences.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11385825     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010329912848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  8 in total

1.  Memory for faces and objects by deaf and hearing signers and hearing nonsigners.

Authors:  P Arnold; C Murray
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1998-07

Review 2.  Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1988-11

Review 3.  Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man.

Authors:  B Milner
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers.

Authors:  K Emmorey; S M Kosslyn; U Bellugi
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993-02

Review 5.  Processing a dynamic visual-spatial language: psycholinguistic studies of American Sign Language.

Authors:  K Emmorey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1993-03

6.  Memory for spatial and temporal order in deaf children.

Authors:  J P Das
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  1983-12

7.  Individual differences and memory for faces, pictures, and words.

Authors:  M M Woodhead; A D Baddeley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-07

8.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise.

Authors:  R Diamond; S Carey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-06
  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Effects of Hearing Status and Sign Language Use on Working Memory.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Thomastine Sarchet; Alexandra Trani
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2016-01-10

2.  Don't Assume Deaf Students are Visual Learners.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Allan Paivio; Linda J Spencer; Andreana Durkin; Georgianna Borgna; Carol Convertino; Elizabeth Machmer
Journal:  J Dev Phys Disabil       Date:  2016-06-02

3.  Cortical plasticity for visuospatial processing and object recognition in deaf and hearing signers.

Authors:  Jill Weisberg; Daniel S Koo; Kelly L Crain; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Routes to short-term memory indexing: lessons from deaf native users of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hirshorn; Nina M Fernandez; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Cognition and functional outcome among deaf and hearing people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Heather K Horton; Steven M Silverstein
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  The signing body: extensive sign language practice shapes the size of hands and face.

Authors:  Laura Mora; Anna Sedda; Teresa Esteban; Gianna Cocchini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Early deafness increases the face inversion effect but does not modulate the composite face effect.

Authors:  Adélaïde de Heering; Abeer Aljuhanay; Bruno Rossion; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-25

8.  A visual processing advantage for young-adolescent deaf observers: Evidence from face and object matching tasks.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Scoping Review of Systems to Train Psychomotor Skills in Hearing Impaired Children.

Authors:  Victor M Peñeñory; Cristina Manresa-Yee; Inmaculada Riquelme; Cesar A Collazos; Habib M Fardoun
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.