Literature DB >> 11385152

Outcomes following extracranial carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.

D Paniagua1, M Howell, N Strickman, J Velasco, K Dougherty, M Skolkin, B Toombs, Z Krajcer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting has become a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA), especially for patients considered at high risk for post-operative complications. This study investigated the feasibility, safety and long-term outcome of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in high-risk patients.
METHODS: From July 1995 to November 2000, sixty-two consecutive patients considered to be at high risk for post-operative complications of CEA were followed prospectively after undergoing extracranial CAS procedures.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients [37 men (60%) and 25 women (40%)] underwent a total of 69 CAS procedures. The mean age was 67 +/- 9 years (range, 32-89 years). Comorbid conditions included hypertension in 95% and severe coronary artery disease in 58%. Sixteen patients (26%) had a previous ipsilateral CEA, twenty-one percent had a history of neck radiation and 32% had a history of significant contralateral carotid artery disease. Fifty-two patients (84%) were symptomatic. All 69 CAS procedures were technically successful. The major post-operative complications were two minor strokes (2.8%), one major stroke (1.4%) and one fatal major stroke (1.4%). The mean length of follow-up was 17 months (range, 4 months to 5.6 years). Two patients (2.8%) have suffered ipsilateral neurologic events following CAS. Long-term follow-up revealed restenosis at 6 months in 4 patients (5.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting is safe and feasible. This procedure produces satisfactory outcomes in patients who are at high risk for post-operative complications of CEA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11385152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  5 in total

1.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  John D Barr; John J Connors; David Sacks; Joan C Wojak; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Bohdan Chopko; Jacques E Dion; Allan J Fox; Randall T Higashida; Robert W Hurst; Curtis A Lewis; Terence A S Matalon; Gary M Nesbit; J Arliss Pollock; Eric J Russell; David J Seidenwurm; Robert C Wallace
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Staged carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy for bilateral internal carotid artery stenosis. Preliminary experience.

Authors:  H Fukuda; K Iihara; N Sakai; K Murao; H Sakai; T Higashi; S Kogure; J Takahashi; K Hayashi; I Nagata
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Factors affecting long-term restenosis after carotid stenting for carotid atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Jai Jai Shiva Shankar; Jingwen Zhang; Marlise dos Santos; Howard Lesiuk; Ravi Mohan; Cheemun Lum
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Multicenter evaluation of a self-expanding carotid stent system with distal protection in the treatment of carotid stenosis.

Authors:  M D Hill; W Morrish; G Soulez; A Nevelsteen; G Maleux; C Rogers; K E Hauptmann; A Bonafé; R Beyar; L Gruberg; J Schofer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Carotid endarterectomy at the millennium: what interventional therapy must match.

Authors:  Glenn M LaMuraglia; David C Brewster; Ashby C Moncure; David J Dorer; Michael C Stoner; Samir K Trehan; Elizabeth C Drummond; William M Abbott; Richard P Cambria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.