Literature DB >> 11385090

Surgical decisions in the elderly: the importance of biological age.

S M Farquharson1, R Gupta, R J Heald, B J Moran.   

Abstract

Surgeons will sometimes advise against an operation because the patient is 'old and frail'. A simple starring system (one to five), based on performance and lifestyle, has been devised to assess the biological age of elderly patients. 10 consultant surgeons and 10 trainees answered questions about their treatment recommendations for hypothetical patients of standard age and medical history but with various star ratings and surgical conditions. 1000 decisions were available for analysis. The four and five star patients (those leading an independent existence) were recommended 266 interventions, the one and two star patients 55. Trainees were more inclined to intervene than consultants, recommending operations in half the patients rather than one-third. These results indicate that decisions on surgical management are strongly influenced by the patient's star rating or biological age. If the starring method proves reproducible in other patient groups and settings, it could allow better communication on an important factor in clinical decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11385090      PMCID: PMC1281455          DOI: 10.1177/014107680109400508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  9 in total

Review 1.  Cancer in old age--is it inadequately investigated and treated?

Authors:  N J Turner; R A Haward; G P Mulley; P J Selby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

2.  Carotid endarterectomy is safe in selected elderly patients.

Authors:  M Pemberton; A Reid; N J London; P R Bell; A R Naylor
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Unstable disability and the fluctuations of frailty.

Authors:  A J Campbell; D M Buchner
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 4.  Risk scoring in surgical patients.

Authors:  H J Jones; L de Cossart
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  The surgeon's 'gut feeling' as a predictor of post-operative outcome.

Authors:  M N Hartley; P M Sagar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Ruptured aortic aneurysm: the decision not to operate.

Authors:  D F Hewin; W B Campbell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-11-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  "Physiological" age as an outcome predictor for abdominal surgery in elderly patients.

Authors:  K Masuo; K Kumagai; T Tanaka; K Yamagata; K Shimizu; Y Nishida; T Iimori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  More about the difference between men and women: evidence from linear neural networks and the principal-component approach.

Authors:  H Abdi; D Valentin; B Edelman; A J O'Toole
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.