Literature DB >> 11384825

The short-term impact of tailored mammography decision-making interventions.

B K Rimer1, S Halabi, C Sugg Skinner, E B Kaplan, Y Crawford, G P Samsa, T S Strigo, I M Lipkus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the short-term impact of decision-making interventions on knowledge about mammography, accuracy of women's breast cancer risk perceptions, attitudes toward mammography, satisfaction with decisions, and mammography use since the intervention.
METHODS: The study was conducted among women who were members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina and were in their 40s or 50s at the time the study began in 1997. Women were randomly assigned to usual care (UC), tailored print booklets (TP) alone, or TP plus telephone counseling (TP+TC ).
RESULTS: 12-month interviews were completed by 1127 women to assess short-term intervention effects. Generally, women who received TP+TC were significantly more knowledgeable about mammography and breast cancer risk and were more accurate in their breast cancer risk perceptions than women in the TP and UC groups. They also were more likely to have had a mammogram since the baseline interview. In multivariable analyses, we found significant benefits of the combination of TP+TC compared to TP and to UC for knowledge, accuracy of risk perceptions, and mammography use. DISCUSSION: For complex decision-making tasks, such as women's decisions about mammography in the face of controversy, the combination of TP and TC may be more effective than TP alone, and certainly more effective than UC. It is critical that investigators determine the topics for which TP is appropriate and the situations that require additional supportive interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11384825     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00172-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  23 in total

Review 1.  Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Silvana Unigwe; Glyn Elwyn; Kerenza Hood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

2.  The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence.

Authors:  Victoria Champion; Celette Sugg Skinner; Siu Hui; Patrick Monahan; Beth Juliar; Joanne Daggy; Usha Menon
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-12-28

3.  Healthy colon, healthy life: a novel colorectal cancer screening intervention.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Rene Salazar; Tung T Nguyen; Celia Kaplan; Lam Kieu Nguyen; Jimmy Hwang; Stephen J McPhee; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

Authors:  R G Jepson; J Hewison; A G H Thompson; D Weller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Using animated computer-generated text and graphics to depict the risks and benefits of medical treatment.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Colleen Brennan-Martinez; Maureen McGonegal; Robert Levine
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Effects of a risk-based online mammography intervention on accuracy of perceived risk and mammography intentions.

Authors:  Holli H Seitz; Laura Gibson; Christine Skubisz; Heather Forquer; Susan Mello; Marilyn M Schapira; Katrina Armstrong; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-05-04

7.  The Effect of Educational Intervention Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior on Mammography Screening in Iranian Women.

Authors:  Ali Khani Jeihooni; Niloofar Darvishi; Pooyan Afzali Harsini
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  A randomized trial of three videos that differ in the framing of information about mammography in women 40 to 49 years old.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Michael P Pignone; Stacey L Sheridan; Stephen M Downs; Linda S Kinsinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Health-related quality of life improvement via telemedicine for epilepsy: printed versus SMS-based education intervention.

Authors:  Pei Lin Lua; Widiasmoro Selamat Neni
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.