Literature DB >> 11384709

Provider attitudes about gaining consent for perinatal autopsy.

T Y Khong1, D Turnbull, A Staples.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the attitudes of neonatologists, obstetricians, midwives, and neonatal nurses toward perinatal autopsy and survey physicians about whom they perceive influence women's decisions on autopsy consent.
METHODS: A postal survey that incorporated a questionnaire of eight fictitious case scenarios and combined three factors (confidence of antemortem diagnosis, intention to have future pregnancy, and parental attitude toward autopsy) in various permutations was sent to various Australian physicians and nurses (all consultant neonatologists working in neonatal intensive care units and a sample of consultant obstetricians, midwives, and neonatal nurses in level III maternity hospitals). Respondents were asked to rate how likely they were to seek consent for or suggest autopsies on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = certainly will not, 7 = certainly will). Interactions between factors and respondents were measured by analysis of variance, and differences were compared using Mann-Whitney U, chi(2), and generalized estimating equation tests.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 70% (neonatologists 57%, obstetricians 62%, midwives 77%, and neonatal nurses 75%). Neonatologists (median score 7, interquartile range 7, 7) were more likely to ask for autopsies than neonatal nurses (5; 2, 6) (P <.001), as were obstetricians (7; 7, 7) compared with midwives (6; 3, 7) (P <.001). Physicians rated midwives and neonatal nurses as having some to substantial influence on mothers' decisions about consent for autopsy.
CONCLUSION: Physicians are not averse to seeking consent for perinatal autopsies. Midwives and nurses are influenced by the three factors studied, which might negatively influence the consent rate for perinatal autopsies. Intervention strategies aimed at changing nurses' attitudes should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11384709     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01123-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Falling neonatal autopsy rates.

Authors:  T Yee Khong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

Review 2.  Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature.

Authors:  C Snowdon; D R Elbourne; J Garcia
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Evaluation of an international educational programme for health care professionals on best practice in the management of a perinatal death: IMproving Perinatal mortality Review and Outcomes Via Education (IMPROVE).

Authors:  Paul A Gardiner; Alison L Kent; Viviana Rodriguez; Aleena M Wojcieszek; David Ellwood; Adrienne Gordon; Patricia A Wilson; Diana M Bond; Adrian Charles; Susan Arbuckle; Glenn J Gardener; Jeremy J Oats; Jan Jaap Erwich; Fleurisca J Korteweg; T H Nguyen Duc; Susannah Hopkins Leisher; Kamal Kishore; Robert M Silver; Alexander E Heazell; Claire Storey; Vicki Flenady
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting.

Authors:  C Lewis; M Hill; O J Arthurs; C Hutchinson; L S Chitty; N J Sebire
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Factors Influencing Acceptance of Post-Mortem Examination of Children at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  Milka Bunei; Peter Muturi; Fred Otiato; Henry N Njuguna; Gideon O Emukule; Nancy A Otieno; Jeanette Dawa; Sandra S Chaves
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.462

6.  Consent to minimally invasive tissue sampling procedures in children in Mozambique: A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Khátia Munguambe; Maria Maixenchs; Rui Anselmo; John Blevins; Jaume Ordi; Inácio Mandomando; Robert F Breiman; Quique Bassat; Clara Menéndez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Holding a baby after stillbirth: the impact of fetal congenital and structural abnormalities.

Authors:  Tess E K Cersonsky; Halit Pinar; Robert M Silver; Robert L Goldenberg; Donald J Dudley; George R Saade; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.