Literature DB >> 11383079

[Teaching and learning in surgery--The Gottingen curriculum].

S König1, P M Markus, H Becker.   

Abstract

The study of medicine in Germany is in need of reform. Oversubscribed courses, the lack of practical reference, scarce patient contact and cancelled lessons define the educational landscape for many students. Since at present we cannot carry out global reforms, the quality of medical education is highly dependent on the commitment of those responsible in the individual institution. The aim of the revised surgical curriculum in Göttingen is to demonstrate how medical education with a high didactic level including multimedia teaching can be realised despite large student numbers. Duties both in patient care and education are coordinated through integrated organisation. Educational content and structure are made transparent by online guidebooks. In the surgical examination course and the practical course in surgery, patient-oriented tuition takes place consistently in small groups. The Teaching Studio provides additional aids such as interactive CD-ROMs, online research, textbooks, ultrasound equipment, examination and suturing dummies. Curriculum-relevant information, including the weekly case examples and instruction guides for clinical practical experience, is presented on an Internet website. Constant evaluation of the curriculum not only documents student motivation, but also serves to improve the educational concepts on a continuous basis. On completion of the practical course in surgery, 65% of participants maintain that they have reached the defined learning objectives "well" or "very well" (prior to reform only 17%). In the summer semester 2000, 46% of students gave top marks in the practical course in surgery with respect to tuition in patient contact. The results of the evaluations verify the positive feedback from the student body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11383079     DOI: 10.1007/s001040170146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  6 in total

1.  [Problem-based learning for surgery. Increased motivation with less teaching personnel?].

Authors:  C Langelotz; T Junghans; N Günther; W Schwenk
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [How can young academics be recruited? Acceptance and effects of urological practice-oriented training].

Authors:  A Hegele; H Heers; F Brüning; C Klapp; A Schönbauer; R Hofmann; T Stibane
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Skills lab from the surgical point of view. Experiences from the Magdeburg Medical School--The University of Magdeburg].

Authors:  K Reschke; K Werwick; L Mersson; K Clasen; D Urbach; H J Haß; F Meyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Integrative vs. Traditional Learning from the Student Perspective.

Authors:  Guni Kadmon; Jan Schmidt; Nicola De Cono; Martina Kadmon
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2011-05-16

5.  A Model for Persistent Improvement of Medical Education as Illustrated by the Surgical Reform Curriculum HeiCuMed.

Authors:  Guni Kadmon; Jan Schmidt; Nicola De Cono; Martina Kadmon
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2011-05-16

6.  Can near-peer medical students effectively teach a new curriculum in physical examination?

Authors:  Wolfgang A Blank; Hannes Blankenfeld; Roger Vogelmann; Klaus Linde; Antonius Schneider
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.