Literature DB >> 11382725

Prediction of mortality by exercise echocardiography: a strategy for combination with the duke treadmill score.

T H Marwick1, C Case, C Vasey, S Allen, L Short, J D Thomas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In studies generally involving short follow-up, exercise echocardiography has been shown to predict composite end points. We sought to study the prediction of mortality with this test and to devise a strategy for combination with standard exercise testing. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Clinical, exercise testing, and echocardiographic data were collected in 5375 patients (aged 54+/-14 years, 3880 men) undergoing exercise echocardiography. The Duke treadmill score was derived from the results of treadmill exercise testing. Resting left ventricular (LV) function and the presence and severity of ischemia were interpreted by expert observers. Follow-up at 10.6 years (mean 5.5+/-1.9 years) was complete in 5211 patients (97%). The Duke score classified 59% of patients as low risk, 39% as intermediate risk, and 2% as high risk. Resting LV dysfunction was present in 1445 patients (27%), and the exercise echocardiogram was abnormal in 2525 patients (47%). Death occurred in 649 patients (12%). Over the first 6 years of follow-up, those with normal exercise echocardiograms had a mortality of 1% per year. Ischemia was an independent predictor of mortality. In sequential Cox models, the predictive power of clinical data was strengthened by adding the Duke score, resting LV function, and the results of exercise echocardiography. Exercise echocardiography was able to substratify patients with intermediate-risk Duke scores into groups with a yearly mortality of 2% to 7%.
CONCLUSIONS: A normal exercise echocardiogram confers a low risk of death, and positive results are an independent predictor of death; ischemia is incremental to other data. This test may be particularly useful in patients with intermediate-risk Duke treadmill scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11382725     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.21.2566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  31 in total

Review 1.  Stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Early insights of cardiac risk and treatment response with quantitative PET monitoring of coronary-specific endothelial dysfunction and myocardial perfusion reserve.

Authors:  Ronald G Schwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  R Senior; M Monaghan; H Becher; J Mayet; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive imaging in known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; D Poldermans; L J Shaw; J W Jukema; H J Lamb; A de Roos; W Wijns; E E van der Wall; J J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Non-invasive tests in coronary artery disease: are we facing a fork in the road?

Authors:  Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  A 28 year old postpartum woman with right sided chest discomfort: case outcome.

Authors:  Girish Dwivedi; Sajad Ahmed Hayat; Andonis G Violaris; Roxy Senior
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-18

7.  Sudden unexpected cardiac death as a function of time since the detection of electrocardiographic and clinical risk factors in apparently healthy men: the Manitoba Follow-Up Study, 1948 to 2004.

Authors:  T Edward Cuddy; Robert B Tate
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 8.  Incidence and predictors of acute coronary syndrome within a year following a negative stress test-a false sense of security: is routine screening any useful?

Authors:  Issa Pour-Ghaz; Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Hemnishil K Marella; Jayna Kelly; Amit Nanda; William Paul Skelton; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

9.  Implications of Abnormal Exercise Electrocardiography With Normal Stress Echocardiography.

Authors:  Melissa A Daubert; Joseph Sivak; Allison Dunning; Pamela S Douglas; Brian Coyne; Tracy Y Wang; Daniel B Mark; Eric J Velazquez
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 10.  Role of myocardial perfusion imaging for risk stratification in suspected or known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  N K Sabharwal; A Lahiri
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.