Literature DB >> 11382332

Threshold dose-response in radiation carcinogenesis: an approach from chronic beta-irradiation experiments and a review of non-tumour doses.

H Tanooka1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To discuss the threshold dose problem in radiation carcinogenesis after a review of the present author's experimental data on mouse tumour induction by chronic beta-irradiation and other relevant data.
CONCLUSIONS: A threshold dose-response in radiation carcinogenesis appears in certain tissues and under certain conditions. The optimum condition for demonstrating an apparent threshold is with partial-body chronic or repeated radiation rather than with acute whole-body radiation. Its possible mechanism is host tolerance, involving DNA repair, apoptosis and an immune response activated by low radiation doses. This tolerance level was examined by a survey in the literature of non-tumour-inducing doses, D(nt), the highest dose at which no significant increase of tumours was observed above the control level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11382332     DOI: 10.1080/09553000110034612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  13 in total

1.  Letter to the editor: response to EPA position on cancer risk from low level radiation.

Authors:  Bernard L Cohen
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

3.  Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.

Authors:  M Tubiana; A Aurengo; D Averbeck; R Masse
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Charles A Sondhaus
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

5.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Low-dose cancer risk modeling must recognize up-regulation of protection.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Residential radon appears to prevent lung cancer.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Radiation cancer risk at different dose rates: new dose-rate effectiveness factors derived from revised A-bomb radiation dosimetry data and non-tumor doses.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tanooka
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 9.  Advances in functional X-ray imaging techniques and contrast agents.

Authors:  Hongyu Chen; Melissa M Rogalski; Jeffrey N Anker
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 3.676

10.  Commentary: ethical issues of current health-protection policies on low-dose ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Yehoshua Socol; Ludwik Dobrzyński; Mohan Doss; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Marek K Janiak; Mark L Miller; Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott; Brant Ulsh; Alexander Vaiserman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.