Literature DB >> 11382258

Outcome measures for evaluation of scar: a literature review.

C G McOwan1, J C MacDermid, J Wilton.   

Abstract

The number of interventions and the related costs of management of scar are increasing. Despite increasing emphasis on evidence-based practice, there is little comparative data on which to base treatment selection. The ability of a therapist to evaluate the natural progression of a scar or treatment efficacy may be hampered by the nature of the particular scar, the lack of conformity in descriptions of scar, and the lack of reliable standardized outcome measurements. This literature review seeks to clarify the constructs measured for scar and present the measures currently available for use.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11382258     DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(01)80037-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Ther        ISSN: 0894-1130            Impact factor:   1.950


  2 in total

1.  6-0 nylon versus 6-0 vicryl rapide in chieloplasty.

Authors:  J K Dayashankara Rao; Payal Luthra; Varun Arya; Vijay Siwach; Anil K Sheorain; Megha Gupta
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

Review 2.  Autologous fat grafting in keloids and hypertrophic scars: a review.

Authors:  Geoffrey Lee; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Scars Burn Heal       Date:  2017-04-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.