Literature DB >> 11382117

[Segmental type 2 manifestation of autosome dominant skin diseases. Development of a new formal genetic concept].

R Happle1.   

Abstract

The prevailing theory says that mosaic forms of autosomal dominant skin diseases originate from postzygotic new mutations. This theory is no longer generally valid. According to a new rule of dichotomy, we can distinguish two types of segmental manifestations. The type 1 reflects heterozygosity for a postzygotic new mutation, whereas the type 2 results from loss of the corresponding wildtype allele occurring in a heterozygous embryo and reflects either homozygosity or hemizygosity for the underlying mutation, giving rise to rather pronounced segmental lesions that are superimposed on the ordinary nonsegmental phenotype. Autosomal dominant skin diseases exemplifying the concept of type 2 segmental manifestation so far include neurofibromatosis 1, tuberous sclerosis, cutaneous leiomyomatosis, glomangiomatosis, Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome, multiple syringomas, multiple trichoepitheliomas, multiple basaloid follicular hamartomas, multiple nevoid basal cell carcinomas, Darier disease, Hailey-Hailey disease, epidermolytic hyperkeratosis of Brocq, KID syndrome, disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis and autosomal dominant dyskeratosis congenita. A strikingly high frequency of type 2 segmental involvement has been documented in cutaneous leiomyomatosis, glomangiomatosis and disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis. It should be noted that there is so far no molecular proof for the proposed rule of dichotomy that has been developed from clinical dermatology. According to present knowledge, however, it is very likely that molecular analysis will confirm the described concept that can explain some so far enigmatic features as observed in autosomal dominant genodermatoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11382117     DOI: 10.1007/s001050051309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hautarzt        ISSN: 0017-8470            Impact factor:   0.751


  6 in total

1.  [Unilateral segmental keratotic papules].

Authors:  S Ott; K Welt; G Hirschfeld; L Weber; K Scharffetter-Kochanek
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  [Segmental type 1 manifestation of Darier disease. An example of cutaneous mosaicism].

Authors:  E Uche-Holub; M Ritter; D Helbig; H Stege; J Frank
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 3.  [Patterns on the skin. New aspects of their embryologic and genetic causes].

Authors:  R Happle
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 4.  [How frequently does genetic mosaicism occur in the skin?].

Authors:  R Happle
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Revised classification/nomenclature of vitiligo and related issues: the Vitiligo Global Issues Consensus Conference.

Authors:  K Ezzedine; H W Lim; T Suzuki; I Katayama; I Hamzavi; C C E Lan; B K Goh; T Anbar; C Silva de Castro; A Y Lee; D Parsad; N van Geel; I C Le Poole; N Oiso; L Benzekri; R Spritz; Y Gauthier; S K Hann; M Picardo; A Taieb
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.693

6.  A case of linear porokeratosis superimposed on disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis.

Authors:  Rebecca Löhrer; Aysegül Neumann-Acikel; Rüdiger Eming; Karin Hartmann; Heinrich Rasokat; Thomas Krieg; Rudolf Happle; Sabine Eming
Journal:  Case Rep Dermatol       Date:  2010-08-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.