Literature DB >> 11382001

Ecological, energetic and economic comparison of anaerobic digestion with different competing technologies to treat biogenic wastes.

W Edelmann1, K Schleiss, A Joss.   

Abstract

In order to get more detailed information for better decision making in future biogenic waste treatment, different processes to treat biogenic wastes in plants with a treating capacity of 10,000 tons of organic household wastes per year were compared. The comparison included life cycle assessments as well as economic considerations for different treating methods. Measurements on compost plants showed that methane emissions are higher than estimated so far. With the tools ECOINDICATOR and UBP anaerobic digestion shows to be advantageous as compared to composting, incineration or combination of digestion and composting, mainly because of a better energy balance. In fully enclosed, professional treatment plants, the specific biotechnological treatment costs are in the range of about 150.-sFr/ton for aerobic, anaerobic and combined technologies. It can be concluded, that anaerobic processes will become considerably more important in the future mainly for ecological reasons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11382001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Sci Technol        ISSN: 0273-1223            Impact factor:   1.915


  2 in total

1.  Advanced techniques for characterization of organic matter from anaerobically digested grapemarc distillery effluents and amended soils.

Authors:  Gennaro Brunetti; Karam Farrag; Cesar Plaza; Nicola Senesi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Mycobacterial Hsp65 antigen upregulates the cellular immune response of healthy individuals compared with tuberculosis patients.

Authors:  Pryscilla Fanini Wowk; Luís Henrique Franco; Denise Morais da Fonseca; Marina Oliveira Paula; Élcio Dos Santos Oliveira Vianna; Ana Paula Wendling; Valéria Maria Augusto; Silvana Maria Elói-Santos; Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho; Flávia Dias Coelho Silva; Solange Alves Vinhas; Olindo Assis Martins-Filho; Moisés Palaci; Célio Lopes Silva; Vânia Luiza Deperon Bonato
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.452

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.