Literature DB >> 11381615

A comparative study on the integration of exogenous DNA into mouse, rat, rabbit, and pig genomes.

M Hirabayashi1, R Takahashi, K Ito, N Kashiwazaki, M Hirao, K Hirasawa, S Hochi, M Ueda.   

Abstract

Transgenic mammals, from small laboratory rodents to domestic animals, have been successfully produced to date, but their production efficiency within or across species has been variable. This is probably due to the differences in the type of injected DNA and/or technical procedures employed in each laboratory, as well as the reproductive characteristics of the species. Here we report the direct comparison of the efficiencies of producing transgenic mice, rats, rabbits and pigs by one technician using a fusion gene composed of the bovine alpha S1-casein promoter and human growth hormone (hGH) gene. Before the fusion gene was injected into the zygotes, high magnitude centrifugation to visualize the pronuclei was necessary for all of the pig zygotes and one-third of the rabbit zygotes, but not for mouse and rat zygotes. Post-injection survival of the mouse zygotes (67.1%) was lower than those of the rat, rabbit and pig zygotes (89.6 to 100%). The volume change of the pronucleus following DNA injection was the lowest in mice (50% increase), moderate in rabbits (148% increase), and the most prominent in rats (238% increase). The data from only 1 pig zygote indicated a 22% increase in the pronucleus volume by DNA injection. The PCR analyses of the tail DNA of new born offspring indicated that 0.8% (4/493), 4.8% (22/463), 0.8% (3/367) and 0.9% (2/221) of the injected eggs in mice, rats, rabbits and pigs, respectively, developed into transgenic offspring. Some of the founder animals in all four species expressed the transgene in the mammary gland which was confirmed in hGH mRNA by RT-PCR and/or hGH peptide in Witch's milk with ELISA. These results suggest that the maximum volume of DNA solution injectable into the pronucleus is a possible factor explaining the species differences in the production of transgenic animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11381615     DOI: 10.1538/expanim.50.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Anim        ISSN: 0007-5124


  14 in total

1.  Establishment and characterization of CAG/EGFP transgenic rabbit line.

Authors:  Ri-ichi Takahashi; Takashi Kuramochi; Kazuki Aoyagi; Shu Hashimoto; Ichiro Miyoshi; Noriyuki Kasai; Yoji Hakamata; Eiji Kobayashi; Masatsugu Ueda
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Increased transgene integration efficiency upon microinjection of DNA into both pronuclei of rabbit embryos.

Authors:  Peter Chrenek; Dusan Vasicek; Alexander V Makarevich; Rastislav Jurcik; Karin Suvegova; Vladimir Parkanyi; Miroslav Bauer; Jan Rafay; Angelika Batorova; Rekha K Paleyanda
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Mammary specific transgenic over-expression of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) increases pig milk IGF-I and IGF binding proteins, with no effect on milk composition or yield.

Authors:  Marcia H Monaco; Derek E Gronlund; Gregory T Bleck; Walter L Hurley; Matthew B Wheeler; Sharon M Donovan
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Strain differences in superovulatory response, embryo development and efficiency of transgenic rat production.

Authors:  Elena Popova; Michael Bader; Alexander Krivokharchenko
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  Transgenic modifications of the rat genome.

Authors:  Laurent Tesson; Jean Cozzi; Séverine Ménoret; Séverine Rémy; Claire Usal; Alexandre Fraichard; Ignacio Anegon
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Pig transgenesis by Sleeping Beauty DNA transposition.

Authors:  Jannik E Jakobsen; Juan Li; Peter M Kragh; Brian Moldt; Lin Lin; Ying Liu; Mette Schmidt; Kjeld Dahl Winther; Brian Dall Schyth; Ida E Holm; Gábor Vajta; Lars Bolund; Henrik Callesen; Arne Lund Jørgensen; Anders Lade Nielsen; Jacob Giehm Mikkelsen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 7.  Beyond the rat models of human neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Ondrej Bugos; Mangesh Bhide; Norbert Zilka
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 5.046

8.  Agrobacterium proteins VirD2 and VirE2 mediate precise integration of synthetic T-DNA complexes in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Pawel Pelczar; Véronique Kalck; Divina Gomez; Barbara Hohn
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  Lentiviral Mediated Production of Transgenic Mice: A Simple and Highly Efficient Method for Direct Study of Founders.

Authors:  Sébastien Dussaud; Corinne Pardanaud-Glavieux; Claire Sauty-Colace; Philippe Ravassard
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Precision editing of large animal genomes.

Authors:  Wenfang Spring Tan; Daniel F Carlson; Mark W Walton; Scott C Fahrenkrug; Perry B Hackett
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.