Literature DB >> 11380757

A self-paced step test to predict aerobic fitness in older adults in the primary care clinic.

R J Petrella1, J J Koval, D A Cunningham, D H Paterson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the potential usefulness of a submaximal self-paced step test as a prediction of maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) in older adults in the primary care setting.
DESIGN: Data were collected during a prospective randomized study of an exercise program.
SETTING: Four university family medical clinics in London, Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 240 healthy older (> or =65) men (n = 118) and women (n = 122) from four family medical clinics underwent self-paced step testing in the clinic with a family physician (n = 16), and step testing and a maximal exercise treadmill test with measurement of respired gases in an exercise laboratory. Testing was done in random order (clinic/laboratory) separated by 2 weeks and then repeated at 52 weeks, following introduction of an exercise program. Relationships between outcome variables were examined by Pearson correlation coefficients while prediction of VO2max was examined using multivariate regression analysis. Cross-validation with 30 age-matched hypertensive and 40 age-matched post-hip arthroplasty patients was used to test the accuracy of the predictive models. MEASUREMENTS: Measured VO2max, predicted VO2max, step test time, step test heart rate, body mass index (BMI), and O2 pulse.
RESULTS: Two hundred women (n = 108) and men (n = 92) completed both the initial and 52-week assessments. Stepping time, heart rate, age, BMI, and O2 pulse were strongly associated with VO2max for both a normal and a fast step pace and were chosen to develop the predictive model. Normal step-pace correlation with VO2max (ml/kg/min) was no different (female 0.93: male 0.91) from fast pace (0.95:0.90) with no difference between clinic and laboratory measurement at baseline or 52 weeks. Cross-validation showed no significant difference from the main group using the predictive model.
CONCLUSIONS: The self-paced step test is a safe and simple clinical instrument that strongly and reliably predicts VO2max, is sensitive to change, and is generalizable in the family practice setting among community-dwelling older adults differing in fitness and health status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11380757     DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49124.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  31 in total

Review 1.  Estimation of maximal oxygen uptake via submaximal exercise testing in sports, clinical, and home settings.

Authors:  Francesco Sartor; Gianluca Vernillo; Helma M de Morree; Alberto G Bonomi; Antonio La Torre; Hans-Peter Kubis; Arsenio Veicsteinas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Are fixed-rate step tests medically safe for assessing physical fitness?

Authors:  Dominique Hansen; Nele Jacobs; Steven Bex; Goedele D'Haene; Paul Dendale; Neree Claes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Validity of the step test for exercise prescription: no extension to a larger age range.

Authors:  Eric D Vidoni; Anna Mattlage; Jonathan Mahnken; Jeffrey M Burns; Joe McDonough; Sandra A Billinger
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  A Machine Learning Approach to Classifying Self-Reported Health Status in a Cohort of Patients With Heart Disease Using Activity Tracker Data.

Authors:  Yiwen Meng; William Speier; Chrisandra Shufelt; Sandy Joung; Jennifer E Van Eyk; C Noel Bairey Merz; Mayra Lopez; Brennan Spiegel; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 5.772

5.  Developing and Validating a Step Test of Aerobic Fitness among Elementary School Children.

Authors:  Rebecca M Hayes; Dylan Maldonado; Tyler Gossett; Terry Shepherd; Saurabh P Mehta; Susan L Flesher
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Improving aerobic fitness in older adults: effects of a physician-based exercise counseling and prescription program.

Authors:  Robert J Petrella; Chastity N Lattanzio; Sheree Shapiro; Tom Overend
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Evaluating Variables as Unbiased Proxies for Other Measures: Assessing the Step Test Exercise Prescription as a Proxy for the Maximal, High-intensity Peak Oxygen Consumption in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jonathan D Mahnken; Xueyi Chen; Alexandra R Brown; Eric D Vidoni; Sandra A Billinger; Byron J Gajewski
Journal:  Int J Stat Probab       Date:  2014

8.  Efficacy of a progressive walking program and glucosamine sulphate supplementation on osteoarthritic symptoms of the hip and knee: a feasibility trial.

Authors:  Norman T M Ng; Kristiann C Heesch; Wendy J Brown
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  Validity and reliability of the Self-Reported Physical Fitness (SRFit) survey.

Authors:  NiCole R Keith; Daniel O Clark; Timothy E Stump; Douglas K Miller; Christopher M Callahan
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2013-05-10

Review 10.  Interventions for promoting physical activity.

Authors:  M Hillsdon; C Foster; M Thorogood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.